Difference between revisions of "20200408-PREX2-Analysis"
From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (→Agenda) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
# Siyu: Update on HRS Optics[https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10JbQpbp58zgOXF0PHpBxWaCtHndDg1j4Iu5hRfWndSA/edit?usp=sharing] | # Siyu: Update on HRS Optics[https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10JbQpbp58zgOXF0PHpBxWaCtHndDg1j4Iu5hRfWndSA/edit?usp=sharing] | ||
| + | #* Guido: how was dp/p calculated ? Siyu: it is a fitted sigma over p. | ||
| + | #* Siyu: The little bump in the middle of H20 spectrum is the first excited state of oxygen. | ||
| + | #* Cip: looks like there is a systematic offset in Sieve residual. Siyu: we are still trying to understand this. | ||
| + | #* Siyu: for raster correction, we didn't modify the database | ||
| + | #* Guido: You can also use one of the EPICS variable for raster correction , I can email you the info. | ||
# Cip: Radiation dose on PREX quartz [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4064 haplog:4064] | # Cip: Radiation dose on PREX quartz [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4064 haplog:4064] | ||
| − | + | #* PS: Does Qsq weighting matter? | |
| + | #* KK: I think Qsq should be small effect. If we have pulse height distribution for the entrie run, it would be useful. | ||
| + | # Tao : pitt level null asymmetry [[http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4066 HAPLOG 4066]] | ||
| + | #* dithering corrected double difference was not averaged by 1/2 and that is the reason why the error bar is twice big. | ||
| + | #* null asymmetry is calculated with equal weight between IN and OUT half-wave plate states, so that the error bar is the quadrature sum divided by sqrt(2) | ||
=== Analysis projects === | === Analysis projects === | ||
# BCM double difference study | # BCM double difference study | ||
| Line 26: | Line 35: | ||
== Present == | == Present == | ||
| − | Adam Z, Alexandre C, Amali P, Brian Q, Cameron C, Caryn P, Chandan G, Ciprian G, Devi A, Devika B, Dmitrii N, Dustin M, Eric K, Ezekiel W, Guido U, Hanjie L, Iris H, Jay B, Juan Carlos C , Juliette M, Paul S, Paul K, | + | Adam Z, Alexandre C, Amali P, Brian Q, Cameron C, Caryn P, Chandan G, Ciprian G, Devi A, Devika B, Dmitrii N, Dustin M, Eric K, Ezekiel W, Guido U, Hanjie L, Iris H, Jay B, Juan Carlos C , Juliette M, Kent P, Paul S, Paul K, Robert M ,Robert R, Ryan R, Sanghwa P, Silviu C, Siyu J, Tao Y, Victoria O, Weibin Z, Ye T, Yufan C, Jim N, Michael G, |
===Excused=== | ===Excused=== | ||
Latest revision as of 18:40, 8 April 2020
Back to Main Page >> PREX2_Analysis
previous meeting << >> following meeting
Logistic information
Meeting room at JLab: REMOTE ONLY
BlueJeans calling instructions: Toll-Free Number (U.S.& Canada): 888-240-2560 International toll number: 408-740-7256 Bluejeans CODE: 206 308 0414 Bluejeans link: https://bluejeans.com/2063080414
Agenda
- Siyu: Update on HRS Optics[1]
- Guido: how was dp/p calculated ? Siyu: it is a fitted sigma over p.
- Siyu: The little bump in the middle of H20 spectrum is the first excited state of oxygen.
- Cip: looks like there is a systematic offset in Sieve residual. Siyu: we are still trying to understand this.
- Siyu: for raster correction, we didn't modify the database
- Guido: You can also use one of the EPICS variable for raster correction , I can email you the info.
- Cip: Radiation dose on PREX quartz haplog:4064
- PS: Does Qsq weighting matter?
- KK: I think Qsq should be small effect. If we have pulse height distribution for the entrie run, it would be useful.
- Tao : pitt level null asymmetry [HAPLOG 4066]
- dithering corrected double difference was not averaged by 1/2 and that is the reason why the error bar is twice big.
- null asymmetry is calculated with equal weight between IN and OUT half-wave plate states, so that the error bar is the quadrature sum divided by sqrt(2)
Analysis projects
- BCM double difference study
- BPM resolution
- Pedestal / Normalization BCM history
- Events/ Patterns Counter
- Dithering sensitivity/Quality re-check
- Grand statistics re-check
- Linearity check
Present
Adam Z, Alexandre C, Amali P, Brian Q, Cameron C, Caryn P, Chandan G, Ciprian G, Devi A, Devika B, Dmitrii N, Dustin M, Eric K, Ezekiel W, Guido U, Hanjie L, Iris H, Jay B, Juan Carlos C , Juliette M, Kent P, Paul S, Paul K, Robert M ,Robert R, Ryan R, Sanghwa P, Silviu C, Siyu J, Tao Y, Victoria O, Weibin Z, Ye T, Yufan C, Jim N, Michael G,
