Difference between revisions of "20200504-Optics-Mtg"
From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchKent Paschke (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Back to Main Page >> HRS_Optics_Mtg previous meeting << >> following meeting == Logistic information ==...") |
Kent Paschke (talk | contribs) (→Agenda) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
#Siyu: | #Siyu: | ||
#*looking for ways to quantify uncertainty on the recoil/watercell measurment | #*looking for ways to quantify uncertainty on the recoil/watercell measurment | ||
| − | #* One documentation question came up: where did the formula giving p0 setting vs. hall probe come from? | + | #* One documentation question came up: where did the formula giving p0 setting vs. hall probe come from? (Note log entry [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3748112 halog:3748112]) |
#* '''next steps:''' look at central value +/- error on parameter (not RMS) to get the error from the fit on the separation | #* '''next steps:''' look at central value +/- error on parameter (not RMS) to get the error from the fit on the separation | ||
#* do this for each of the momentum settings | #* do this for each of the momentum settings | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
#* is able to run Siyu’s code to check the optics database reconstruction | #* is able to run Siyu’s code to check the optics database reconstruction | ||
#* '''Next steps:''' will use this to start to verify the PREX database | #* '''Next steps:''' will use this to start to verify the PREX database | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== Attendence == | == Attendence == | ||
rom,ryan, siyu, dustin, devi, cip, chandan, nilanga, kent | rom,ryan, siyu, dustin, devi, cip, chandan, nilanga, kent | ||
Revision as of 15:38, 4 May 2020
Back to Main Page >> HRS_Optics_Mtg
previous meeting << >> following meeting
Logistic information
Toll-Free Number (U.S.& Canada): 888-240-2560 PARTICIPANT CODE: # 585 129 220 Room IRL: <none>
Agenda
Please post slides in haplog or docdb, before the meeting
- Kent - quickly reviewing what we need to get done
- CREX calibration and verification
- PREX calibration and verification
- central angle calibration. PREX and CREX to compare
- Q2, acceptance function, for PREX, CREX, and transverse running
- Background.
- inelastic
- carbon
- Siyu:
- looking for ways to quantify uncertainty on the recoil/watercell measurment
- One documentation question came up: where did the formula giving p0 setting vs. hall probe come from? (Note log entry halog:3748112)
- next steps: look at central value +/- error on parameter (not RMS) to get the error from the fit on the separation
- do this for each of the momentum settings
- ultimately, do this for each of the holes in the sieve.
- Also: use error propagation to see how recoil energy difference or derived scattering angle depends on beam energy, scattering angle...
- Ryan:
- is able to run Siyu’s code to check the optics database reconstruction
- Next steps: will use this to start to verify the PREX database
Attendence
rom,ryan, siyu, dustin, devi, cip, chandan, nilanga, kent
