Difference between revisions of "PREX CREX Target Studies"
From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
** [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4425 Weibin's more recent HAPLOG and slides] | ** [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4425 Weibin's more recent HAPLOG and slides] | ||
| − | == Cameron's DNP 2020 Target Talk == | + | == Target studies during CREX / Cameron's DNP 2020 Target Talk == |
* [https://prex.jlab.org/cgi-bin/DocDB/private/ShowDocument?docid=470 DocDB Entry 470] | * [https://prex.jlab.org/cgi-bin/DocDB/private/ShowDocument?docid=470 DocDB Entry 470] | ||
Revision as of 17:07, 30 January 2021
Pb Target Density studies during PREX
- Here - Sanghwa and co did some careful studies of the Pb target's density vs. time and as a result of different amounts of current or total charge (across the experiment)
- That page also contains a mention of Weibin's simulations for verifying those study's results, which have also been followed up with further
- Weibin's more recent HAPLOG and slides
Target studies during CREX / Cameron's DNP 2020 Target Talk
Questions that needed to be addressed:
- Temperature and Radiation in the hall during Target Degradation
- Main detector signals effect during Target Degradation
- Raster Frequencies to minimize L-R Correlated Noise
- Raster Size effect on regression analysis
- Beam Current effect on regression analysis
- CFD Simulations of Target Heating vs. Diamond Thermal Conductivity
- DocDB entry with all of my notes and plots I used in analyzing the data to make conclusions: Here
- Includes 3 documents with summary of runs, some sample plots, and links to HALOGs, etc. - Runplan Doc, Data taking notes, Analysis Doc
- Also includes tarballs with lots of plots used in analyzing data mentioned in that document
