Difference between revisions of "20210114-PREX2-Analysis"
From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchm (→Agenda) |
Kent Paschke (talk | contribs) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Back to [[Main_Page|Main Page]] >> [[PREX2_Analysis]] | Back to [[Main_Page|Main Page]] >> [[PREX2_Analysis]] | ||
| − | [[20201209-PREX2-Analysis|previous meeting]] << >> [[ | + | [[20201209-PREX2-Analysis|previous meeting]] << >> [[20210211-PREX2-Analysis|following meeting]] |
== Logistic information == | == Logistic information == | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
# Respin: Paul K & co | # Respin: Paul K & co | ||
#* [[WAC Notes January 12 2021]] | #* [[WAC Notes January 12 2021]] | ||
| + | #* PK: large completed (just a few runs left). Meeting on Tue to survey of the data (comparing with the prompt). Robert has analyzed some of the runs and we seem to have about 1% less "good data". | ||
| + | #* PK: we'll try to understand how much of the BeamMod data is actually useable for CREX (currently it is still out). | ||
| + | #* CC: we are doing some work to make the analysis a bit easier, and we are documenting it on the haplog | ||
| + | #* CC: we will continue investigating what the best combination of BPMs and coils are going to be used in the analysis. | ||
# Target degradation study: Weibin Z [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4430 haplog4430] | # Target degradation study: Weibin Z [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4430 haplog4430] | ||
| − | #* | + | #* WZ: this analysis tries to determine the effect of target degradation on the Q2 distribution |
| + | #* CG: while this study doesn't completely explain the steady radiation increase, it does show that we can make significant changes (up to 100um) to the center of the target thickness and still get the same Q2 distribution. Combine that with the fact that we have a measurement of the Q2 distribution after a target failed we can be fairly certain that this effect won't have any impact on the PREX-2 result | ||
# Other (all): | # Other (all): | ||
| − | #* [[BMOD_13Jan2021|Beam modulation meetings are back on | + | #* [[BMOD_13Jan2021|Beam modulation meetings]] are back on - initial [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4432 plots] |
| + | #* [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4427 Respin1 data on the ifarm] | ||
| + | #* [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4429 Aggregator summary] | ||
| + | #* DJ: Any suggestions or plots that you think should be included in my CREX overview talk at the Hall A Collaboration meeting are welcome. I'll try to circulate a draft early next week. | ||
== Present == | == Present == | ||
| − | + | Caryn P, Sanghwa P, Guido U, Ciprian Gl, Devi A, Jay B, Robert M, Robert R, Sakib R, David A, Hanjie L, Silviu D, Ye T, Victoria O, Adam Z, Chandan G, Jim N, Paul K, Ryan R, Tao Y, Cameron C, Weibin Z, KK, Don J, Dustin M, | |
===Excused=== | ===Excused=== | ||
| − | + | Kent P | |
[[Category:Meetings]] | [[Category:Meetings]] | ||
[[Category:PREX2_Analysis]] | [[Category:PREX2_Analysis]] | ||
Latest revision as of 22:43, 10 February 2021
Back to Main Page >> PREX2_Analysis
previous meeting << >> following meeting
Logistic information
Time: Thursday, 1PM Meeting room at JLab: REMOTE ONLY
BlueJeans calling instructions: Toll-Free Number (U.S.& Canada): 888-240-2560 International toll number: 408-740-7256 Bluejeans CODE: 402 129 576 Bluejeans link: https://bluejeans.com/402129576
Agenda
- Respin: Paul K & co
- WAC Notes January 12 2021
- PK: large completed (just a few runs left). Meeting on Tue to survey of the data (comparing with the prompt). Robert has analyzed some of the runs and we seem to have about 1% less "good data".
- PK: we'll try to understand how much of the BeamMod data is actually useable for CREX (currently it is still out).
- CC: we are doing some work to make the analysis a bit easier, and we are documenting it on the haplog
- CC: we will continue investigating what the best combination of BPMs and coils are going to be used in the analysis.
- Target degradation study: Weibin Z haplog4430
- WZ: this analysis tries to determine the effect of target degradation on the Q2 distribution
- CG: while this study doesn't completely explain the steady radiation increase, it does show that we can make significant changes (up to 100um) to the center of the target thickness and still get the same Q2 distribution. Combine that with the fact that we have a measurement of the Q2 distribution after a target failed we can be fairly certain that this effect won't have any impact on the PREX-2 result
- Other (all):
- Beam modulation meetings are back on - initial plots
- Respin1 data on the ifarm
- Aggregator summary
- DJ: Any suggestions or plots that you think should be included in my CREX overview talk at the Hall A Collaboration meeting are welcome. I'll try to circulate a draft early next week.
Present
Caryn P, Sanghwa P, Guido U, Ciprian Gl, Devi A, Jay B, Robert M, Robert R, Sakib R, David A, Hanjie L, Silviu D, Ye T, Victoria O, Adam Z, Chandan G, Jim N, Paul K, Ryan R, Tao Y, Cameron C, Weibin Z, KK, Don J, Dustin M,
Excused
Kent P
