Difference between revisions of "BMOD 12May2021"
From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchm |
m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
=== May 12 === | === May 12 === | ||
| − | * Another look at regression vs. dithering, different techniques basically agree: [ | + | * Another look at regression vs. dithering, different techniques basically agree: [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4533 slides] |
** Conclusions: | ** Conclusions: | ||
*** It looks like the difference between two techniques of calculating reg vs. dit corrections doesn't matter, implicating that there is no correlation between the two distributions at all? It is not clear exactly how to interpret the non-gaussian distribution in Fig 1.c's equation 1 output matching equation 2 | *** It looks like the difference between two techniques of calculating reg vs. dit corrections doesn't matter, implicating that there is no correlation between the two distributions at all? It is not clear exactly how to interpret the non-gaussian distribution in Fig 1.c's equation 1 output matching equation 2 | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
**** Averaged central values of evMonitor-wise net corrections | **** Averaged central values of evMonitor-wise net corrections | ||
**** Residual dithering sensitivities | **** Residual dithering sensitivities | ||
| + | * Looking at different time scale histogramming - Robert is making progress | ||
== Attendence == | == Attendence == | ||
Cameron, Robert, Kent, Paul Souder, Tao Ye, Victoria, Weibin, Ye Tian | Cameron, Robert, Kent, Paul Souder, Tao Ye, Victoria, Weibin, Ye Tian | ||
Latest revision as of 15:54, 12 May 2021
BMOD_28April2021 << >> BMOD_19May2021
Logistic information
BlueJeans calling instructions: Toll-Free Number (U.S.& Canada): 888-240-2560 International toll number: 408-740-7256 Bluejeans CODE: 948942477 Bluejeans link: https://bluejeans.com/948942477
Agenda
May 12
- Another look at regression vs. dithering, different techniques basically agree: slides
- Conclusions:
- It looks like the difference between two techniques of calculating reg vs. dit corrections doesn't matter, implicating that there is no correlation between the two distributions at all? It is not clear exactly how to interpret the non-gaussian distribution in Fig 1.c's equation 1 output matching equation 2
- Figure 2 shows that there are only a few outliers (also they have large RMS), so our two methods (dit and reg) are similar and fairly safely consistent across the run.
- To Do:
- Chase down dit-reg outliers again in the respin2 outputs
- Separate 3 eigenvector definition-parts' estimates of systematic errors and slopes trustworthiness:
- Averaged central values of evMonitor-wise net corrections
- Residual dithering sensitivities
- Conclusions:
- Looking at different time scale histogramming - Robert is making progress
Attendence
Cameron, Robert, Kent, Paul Souder, Tao Ye, Victoria, Weibin, Ye Tian
