Difference between revisions of "PREX/CREX Sep 4 2017 02:30pm EDT"
From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchCiprian Gal (talk | contribs) |
Ciprian Gal (talk | contribs) (→Agenda) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
# Ciprian: dump shielding [https://prex.jlab.org/wiki/images/b/be/170905_PREX_Dump_CGal.pdf slides] | # Ciprian: dump shielding [https://prex.jlab.org/wiki/images/b/be/170905_PREX_Dump_CGal.pdf slides] | ||
| − | #* DG: why not increase? SR: we should revisit this. | + | #* DG: why not increase the collimator angle? SR: we should revisit this. |
| − | #* SR: is there room for having a thinner target? BM: 10% is optimum; having thinner lead would increase likelihood to melt it. DG: I would hesitate to officially change this | + | #* SR: is there room for having a thinner Pb target? BM: 10% is optimum; having thinner lead would increase likelihood to melt it. DG: I would hesitate to officially change this |
== Attendance == | == Attendance == | ||
Revision as of 15:19, 5 September 2017
Back to Main Page >> PREX/CREX_Teleconferences
previous meeting << >> following meeting
Logistic information
BlueJeans calling instructions: Toll-Free Number (U.S.& Canada): 888-240-2560 International toll number: 408-740-7256 PARTICIPANT CODE: 847 917 938# Room IRL: CEBAF F227
Agenda
- Ciprian: dump shielding slides
- DG: why not increase the collimator angle? SR: we should revisit this.
- SR: is there room for having a thinner Pb target? BM: 10% is optimum; having thinner lead would increase likelihood to melt it. DG: I would hesitate to officially change this
Attendance
Dave G, Adam JZ, Tao Y, Sanghwa P, Tyler K, Ciprian G, Seamus R, Cameron C, Ryan R, Bob M, Dustin M, Guido U,
Excused:
Kent P, KK
