Difference between revisions of "PREX/CREX Aug 1, 2018 10:00am"
From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchCiprian Gal (talk | contribs) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
# Cameron: SAM simulation update | # Cameron: SAM simulation update | ||
− | * target shift effect and energy shift effect | + | #* target shift effect and energy shift effect |
− | ** [https://prex.jlab.org/cgi-bin/DocDB/private/ShowDocument?docid=219 Slides] | + | #** [https://prex.jlab.org/cgi-bin/DocDB/private/ShowDocument?docid=219 Slides] |
− | ** [[media:Cameron_Prex_meeting_8-1-2018.pdf|Wiki Slides]] | + | #** [[media:Cameron_Prex_meeting_8-1-2018.pdf|Wiki Slides]] |
− | ** [https://ace.phys.virginia.edu:80/HAPPEX/3528 ELOG (includes excel sheet with ratio data)] | + | #** [https://ace.phys.virginia.edu:80/HAPPEX/3528 ELOG (includes excel sheet with ratio data)] |
− | * see /work/parity/disk1/moller12gev/cameronc/masterPrexSim/output/data_FINAL_2018-07-31_post-collab-meeting for raw hallRad.root output data summaries | + | #** CC: looking at the solid angle for different configurations can give some indication for the change in radiation levels. KP: I think there should not be that large of a difference in solid angle. CC: will check the solid angle equation and should probably convolute the beam profile. KP: could be an interesting exercise but it really not relevant. PK: we can discuss the solid angle definition, because it is definitely wrong |
− | + | #** CC: the no SAM configuration increases by 2% for the US target move and a total of 8% for both target move and energy lowering. | |
+ | #** CG: the CREX numbers don’t make sense. CC: will double check why including the SAMs lowers the radiation in the hall. On closer inspection the ratios are dominated by the statistical uncertainty of the CREX simulation, meaning that the CREX number with and without SAMs are the same within error bars. | ||
+ | #* see /work/parity/disk1/moller12gev/cameronc/masterPrexSim/output/data_FINAL_2018-07-31_post-collab-meeting for raw hallRad.root output data summaries | ||
+ | |||
== Present == | == Present == | ||
− | + | Tyler K, Amali P, Ciprian G, Cameron C, Chandon G, Victoria O, Eric K, Bob M, Ryan R, David A, Paul K, Guido U, Juliette M, Caryn P, Tao Y , Jinlong Z, | |
===Excused=== | ===Excused=== | ||
− | Sanghwa P, | + | KK, Sanghwa P, Dave G, Adam Z, |
[[Category:Meetings]] | [[Category:Meetings]] | ||
[[Category:Prex Weekly Meeting]] | [[Category:Prex Weekly Meeting]] |
Latest revision as of 10:50, 1 August 2018
Back to Main Page >> PREX/CREX_Teleconferences
previous meeting << >> following meeting
Logistic information
BlueJeans calling instructions: Toll-Free Number (U.S.& Canada): 888-240-2560 International toll number: 408-740-7256 Bluejeans CODE: 627 455 790 Bluejeans link: https://bluejeans.com/627455790 Offline room: CEBAF Center L210A
Agenda
- Cameron: SAM simulation update
- target shift effect and energy shift effect
- Slides
- Wiki Slides
- ELOG (includes excel sheet with ratio data)
- CC: looking at the solid angle for different configurations can give some indication for the change in radiation levels. KP: I think there should not be that large of a difference in solid angle. CC: will check the solid angle equation and should probably convolute the beam profile. KP: could be an interesting exercise but it really not relevant. PK: we can discuss the solid angle definition, because it is definitely wrong
- CC: the no SAM configuration increases by 2% for the US target move and a total of 8% for both target move and energy lowering.
- CG: the CREX numbers don’t make sense. CC: will double check why including the SAMs lowers the radiation in the hall. On closer inspection the ratios are dominated by the statistical uncertainty of the CREX simulation, meaning that the CREX number with and without SAMs are the same within error bars.
- see /work/parity/disk1/moller12gev/cameronc/masterPrexSim/output/data_FINAL_2018-07-31_post-collab-meeting for raw hallRad.root output data summaries
- target shift effect and energy shift effect
Present
Tyler K, Amali P, Ciprian G, Cameron C, Chandon G, Victoria O, Eric K, Bob M, Ryan R, David A, Paul K, Guido U, Juliette M, Caryn P, Tao Y , Jinlong Z,
Excused
KK, Sanghwa P, Dave G, Adam Z,