Difference between revisions of "Target density variation check"
From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
** [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3727983 HALOG summary] | ** [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3727983 HALOG summary] | ||
** Took high statistics run at very low current (30nA requested), Target #10 | ** Took high statistics run at very low current (30nA requested), Target #10 | ||
| + | ** Septum at nominal setting, no Sieve | ||
** Similar result shown in RHRS data as previous high current test | ** Similar result shown in RHRS data as previous high current test | ||
** Different distribution in LHRS is puzzling | ** Different distribution in LHRS is puzzling | ||
Revision as of 15:21, 3 September 2019
- First measurement 09/02/2019
- HALOG summary
- Target #7 and #10 were checked for current range 5-70uA
- Septum mistuned on purpose in order to reduce rates, T2 trigger is used
- Sieve in
- Clear non-uniformity observed from degraded target (#10) compared to good (still in use) target (#7).
- More visible at higher current, but hint of similar signature of density rearrangement seen at low current.
- Consistent results from both LHRS and RHRS spot data
- Second measurement 09/03/2019
- HALOG summary
- Took high statistics run at very low current (30nA requested), Target #10
- Septum at nominal setting, no Sieve
- Similar result shown in RHRS data as previous high current test
- Different distribution in LHRS is puzzling
