Difference between revisions of "WAC Notes January 31 2020"

From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 27: Line 27:
 
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6085_000 Run 6085]
 
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6085_000 Run 6085]
 
* Need cut - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6086_000 Run 6086]: large bcm asym due to issue in the injector, cut out events whose asym_bcm > 500 ppm
 
* Need cut - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6086_000 Run 6086]: large bcm asym due to issue in the injector, cut out events whose asym_bcm > 500 ppm
* Need cut - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6087_000 Run 6087]: same as run 6086
+
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6087_000 Run 6087]
 
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6089_000 Run 6089]
 
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6089_000 Run 6089]
 
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6090_000 Run 6090]
 
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6090_000 Run 6090]
Line 37: Line 37:
 
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6094_000 Run 6094]
 
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6094_000 Run 6094]
 
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6098_000 Run 6098]
 
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6098_000 Run 6098]
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6099_000 Run 6099]
+
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6099_000 Run 6099]: a little large bcm asym, but is ok
  
 
continue slug 122 on [https://prex.jlab.org/wiki/index.php?title=WAC_Notes_February_1_2020 February 1]
 
continue slug 122 on [https://prex.jlab.org/wiki/index.php?title=WAC_Notes_February_1_2020 February 1]
Line 57: Line 57:
 
* run 6087: after cut, there are still some miniruns with large injector asym in asym_bpm2i01WS, should I cut them out?
 
* run 6087: after cut, there are still some miniruns with large injector asym in asym_bpm2i01WS, should I cut them out?
 
* quite large bcm asym (324 ppm) in run 6099, don't know why. the asym in injector asym_bpm2i01WS is quite large: -8.67 compare to grand average value (< 5ppm)
 
* quite large bcm asym (324 ppm) in run 6099, don't know why. the asym in injector asym_bpm2i01WS is quite large: -8.67 compare to grand average value (< 5ppm)
 +
* slug 122: quite large asym. in bpm2i01WS_mean: -7.127 (usually < 5) ppm
  
 
== Updates ==
 
== Updates ==

Latest revision as of 23:54, 21 April 2020

Documentation
HOW TOs for shift crew
Expert Tools
All Expert Contacts



PREX Main << Weekly Analysis Coordinator << WAC Notes CREX << Instructions

WAC Notes January 30 2020 << >> WAC Notes February 1 2020

January 31 2020

Daily Meeting BlueJeans


Production Run List - Slug 121 - IHWP OUT - Flip-RIGHT - Production

continue slug 121 from January 29:

Production Run List - Slug 122 - IHWP IN - Flip-RIGHT - Production

start the new slug at ~ 7 am

continue slug 122 on February 1

Non-Production Runs and Bad Runs

Pedestal/Calibrations Updates

BeamMod Commissioning calibration runs: 6076 - 6084

Issues

  • There are some issues in the injector, resulting in large bcm asym in two runs (6086, 6087)
  • run 6087: after cut, there are still some miniruns with large injector asym in asym_bpm2i01WS, should I cut them out?
  • quite large bcm asym (324 ppm) in run 6099, don't know why. the asym in injector asym_bpm2i01WS is quite large: -8.67 compare to grand average value (< 5ppm)
  • slug 122: quite large asym. in bpm2i01WS_mean: -7.127 (usually < 5) ppm

Updates