Difference between revisions of "WAC Notes February 16 2020"

From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
[[Main_Page|<B>PREX Main</B>]] << [[Weekly Analysis Coordinator]] << [[WAC Notes CREX]] << [[WAC|Instructions]]
 
[[Main_Page|<B>PREX Main</B>]] << [[Weekly Analysis Coordinator]] << [[WAC Notes CREX]] << [[WAC|Instructions]]
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
[[WAC Notes February 15 2020]] << >> [[WAC Notes February 17 2020]]
+
[[WAC Notes February 12 2020]] << >> [[WAC Notes February 17 2020]]
  
 
== February 16 2020 ==
 
== February 16 2020 ==
Line 24: Line 24:
  
 
=== Production Run List - Slug 135 - IHWP OUT - Flip-RIGHT - Production ===
 
=== Production Run List - Slug 135 - IHWP OUT - Flip-RIGHT - Production ===
start this slug at the end of Swing shift, February 16 after a long down (waiting for HALL B pass change)
+
Start this slug at the end of Swing shift, February 16 after a long down (waiting for HALL B pass change)
* Need Cut - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6424_000 Run 6424]
+
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6424_000 Run 6424]
** User_Comment says checking blinder, and marked as Junk run but is a '''Production run on Ca-48 target'''
+
** User_Comment says checking blinder,but is a '''Production run on Ca-48 target'''. User_comment in the hard copy says moved to C-Hole at the end of the run
** ~30uA loss in 0l02 starting this run. Aq is quite large, huge excursion in '''0i02''' (injector clipping?) in the second half of the run
+
** Aq is quite large but within errorbar in the second half of the run
 
** Larger energy slopes comparing with production running before but is at the same level where we left during A_T measurements
 
** Larger energy slopes comparing with production running before but is at the same level where we left during A_T measurements
 
** An outlier in '''ATL1'''
 
** An outlier in '''ATL1'''
 
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6427_000 Run 6427]
 
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6427_000 Run 6427]
* Need Cut? - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6428_000 Run 6428]
+
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6428_000 Run 6428]
** Only a few thousands of Good Events. Quite large Aq and excursion in '''0i02''' in the beginning
+
** Only a few thousands of Good Events. Quite large Aq but within errorbar in the beginning
 
** Raster current changed
 
** Raster current changed
 
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6429_000 Run 6429]
 
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6429_000 Run 6429]
Line 40: Line 40:
 
** 150uA and 140uA beam
 
** 150uA and 140uA beam
 
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6432_000 Run 6432]
 
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6432_000 Run 6432]
** No loss in 0l02
+
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6433_000 Run 6433]
 +
** Some excursion in 0i01Y, loss in 0l02 for a while
 +
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6434_000 Run 6434]
 +
** Quite large Aq in minirun 2. Quite large slopes and widths in minirun 3,4, and 5.
 +
** Huge excursion in bpm4ec
 +
** >1mm excursion in bpm12X for a while in the middle of the run
 +
** USL yield decreased while USR yield increased in the middle of the run. This matches with bpm4ec but other bpms donot have such a big excursion
 +
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6435_000 Run 6435]
 +
** Quite large Aq in minirun 1
 +
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6436_000 Run 6436]
 +
** Loss in 0l02, excursion in 1l01Y in the middle of the run
 +
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6437_000 Run 6437]
  
 
== Non-Production Runs and Bad Runs ==
 
== Non-Production Runs and Bad Runs ==

Latest revision as of 16:31, 10 December 2020

Documentation
HOW TOs for shift crew
Expert Tools
All Expert Contacts



PREX Main << Weekly Analysis Coordinator << WAC Notes CREX << Instructions

WAC Notes February 12 2020 << >> WAC Notes February 17 2020

February 16 2020

Daily Meeting BlueJeans


Production Run List - Slug 135 - IHWP OUT - Flip-RIGHT - Production

Start this slug at the end of Swing shift, February 16 after a long down (waiting for HALL B pass change)

  • Good - Run 6424
    • User_Comment says checking blinder,but is a Production run on Ca-48 target. User_comment in the hard copy says moved to C-Hole at the end of the run
    • Aq is quite large but within errorbar in the second half of the run
    • Larger energy slopes comparing with production running before but is at the same level where we left during A_T measurements
    • An outlier in ATL1
  • Good - Run 6427
  • Good - Run 6428
    • Only a few thousands of Good Events. Quite large Aq but within errorbar in the beginning
    • Raster current changed
  • Good - Run 6429
  • Good - Run 6430
    • Large (~-11%) residual correlation of USL with AqUS
  • Good - Run 6431
    • 150uA and 140uA beam
  • Good - Run 6432
  • Good - Run 6433
    • Some excursion in 0i01Y, loss in 0l02 for a while
  • Good - Run 6434
    • Quite large Aq in minirun 2. Quite large slopes and widths in minirun 3,4, and 5.
    • Huge excursion in bpm4ec
    • >1mm excursion in bpm12X for a while in the middle of the run
    • USL yield decreased while USR yield increased in the middle of the run. This matches with bpm4ec but other bpms donot have such a big excursion
  • Good - Run 6435
    • Quite large Aq in minirun 1
  • Good - Run 6436
    • Loss in 0l02, excursion in 1l01Y in the middle of the run
  • Good - Run 6437

Non-Production Runs and Bad Runs

  • run6425 is in C-Hole
  • run6426 is in C-Hole, but rcdb says "Production"

Pedestal/Calibrations Updates

Issues

Updates