Difference between revisions of "20200710-PREX2-Analysis"

From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "Back to Main Page >> PREX2_Analysis previous meeting << >> following meeting == Logistic informat...")
 
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
== Agenda ==
 
== Agenda ==
# Ciprian : preliminary results for transverse run
+
# Ciprian : preliminary results for transverse run [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ZI68PgAn_zySKozZ__kHBvxlBmaTMKw9jPSl-EIa91k/edit?usp=sharing spreadSheet] [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4174 atPlots]
# Don : Discussion on Moller result during transverse run
+
#* Devi:cos(phi) is from PREX-I. CG: will cross-check.
 +
#* KK: we are not going to present An-hat (impurity corrected) next week.
 +
#* David A: I checked - the PREx point in the original version of the paper was plotted with the error bar being total (stats + syst added in quadrature): 0.28 +- 0.25 ppm
 +
# Don : Discussion on Moller result during transverse run [https://hallcweb.jlab.org/elogs/Hall+A+Moller/200710_124438/Polarization_for_Transverse_Running.pdf Moller elog] or [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/200710_124840/Polarization_for_Transverse_Running.pdf Ace Elog]
 +
#* KK: what's the total error from polarimetry. CG: about 2% relative error.
 +
# Paul:  Initial look at drifts in BCM event-level difference; follow up needed.  http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4162
 +
#* TY: run 3454, the rising behaviour only happens in analog upstream BCM
 +
#* CP: there is a power supply replacement in the BCM. Majority of the runs happen before power supply replacement.
 +
#* GU: is there any intensity dependence. PK: No.
 +
#* GU: is the beam current at normal run condition. PK: these runs are in typical beam current.
 +
# Victoria: glance at PREX-II statistics including bmod data
 +
 
 
== Present ==
 
== Present ==
 
+
Adam Z, Eric K, Ezekiel W, Iris H, Quinn C, Robert R, Ryan R, Tao Y, Dimitrii N, Victoria O, Paul S, Paul K, Ye T, Chandan G, Amali P, Ciprian G, Don J, Cameron Clarke, Devi A, KK, David A, Weibin Z, Silviu CD, Jim N, Caryn P, Guido U, Dustin M, Sangwha P, Brian Q, Sakib R, Mark, Siyu J
 
===Excused===
 
===Excused===
  

Latest revision as of 09:21, 13 July 2020

Back to Main Page >> PREX2_Analysis

previous meeting << >> following meeting

Logistic information

Meeting room at JLab: REMOTE ONLY

 BlueJeans calling instructions:
 Toll-Free Number (U.S.&  Canada):  888-240-2560
 International toll number:         408-740-7256
 Bluejeans CODE: 206 308 0414                 
 Bluejeans link: https://bluejeans.com/2063080414

Agenda

  1. Ciprian : preliminary results for transverse run spreadSheet atPlots
    • Devi:cos(phi) is from PREX-I. CG: will cross-check.
    • KK: we are not going to present An-hat (impurity corrected) next week.
    • David A: I checked - the PREx point in the original version of the paper was plotted with the error bar being total (stats + syst added in quadrature): 0.28 +- 0.25 ppm
  2. Don : Discussion on Moller result during transverse run Moller elog or Ace Elog
    • KK: what's the total error from polarimetry. CG: about 2% relative error.
  3. Paul: Initial look at drifts in BCM event-level difference; follow up needed. http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4162
    • TY: run 3454, the rising behaviour only happens in analog upstream BCM
    • CP: there is a power supply replacement in the BCM. Majority of the runs happen before power supply replacement.
    • GU: is there any intensity dependence. PK: No.
    • GU: is the beam current at normal run condition. PK: these runs are in typical beam current.
  4. Victoria: glance at PREX-II statistics including bmod data

Present

Adam Z, Eric K, Ezekiel W, Iris H, Quinn C, Robert R, Ryan R, Tao Y, Dimitrii N, Victoria O, Paul S, Paul K, Ye T, Chandan G, Amali P, Ciprian G, Don J, Cameron Clarke, Devi A, KK, David A, Weibin Z, Silviu CD, Jim N, Caryn P, Guido U, Dustin M, Sangwha P, Brian Q, Sakib R, Mark, Siyu J

Excused