Difference between revisions of "TransverseAnalysisMeeting July 14 2020"
From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchCiprian Gal (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Back to Main Page >> Transverse Analysis Meetings previous meeting << >> TransverseAnal...") |
Ciprian Gal (talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Back to [[Main_Page|Main Page]] >> [[PREX/CREX Transverse | Transverse Analysis Meetings]] | Back to [[Main_Page|Main Page]] >> [[PREX/CREX Transverse | Transverse Analysis Meetings]] | ||
| − | [[TransverseAnalysisMeeting_July_7_2020|previous meeting]] << | + | [[TransverseAnalysisMeeting_July_7_2020|previous meeting]] << last meeting |
| − | |||
== Logistic information == | == Logistic information == | ||
BlueJeans calling instructions: | BlueJeans calling instructions: | ||
| Line 8: | Line 7: | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
| − | # Preliminary plots: Ciprian | + | # Preliminary plots: Ciprian [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4174 haplog4147] |
| − | #* | + | #* KK: Interesting fact: Linear fit going through 0 is clearly inconsistent with data. |
| + | #* KK: Interesting fact: The data is showing the Q dependence is power less than 1 | ||
| + | #* KK: Interesting fact: Ca40/48 sit on top of each other; it doesn't go to lower value (more N closer to Pb) | ||
| + | #* KK: we are the only measurements that are fwd angle where the optical theorem works and we cleanly cut out the inelastic data (Si, Zr data don't have inelastic but are not fwd angle) | ||
| + | #* KK: might be useful to make a plot * Z/A | ||
| + | #* DM: the "high Q2" for the Pb data at 2GeV is probably related to the high C contamination. KK: agreed, we should make sure we correct this in the final publication. | ||
| + | # RyR: limited data on C1%, the data was taken before we moved the tgt encoder. CG: this should in principle would be ok. We should evaluate the to see if it gives us all we need or we need to get more data to get an appropriate error bar. | ||
== Present == | == Present == | ||
| − | + | Devi A, Kent P, KK, Paul K, Robert R, Ryan R, Weibin Z, Cameron C, Ciprian G, David A, Caryn P, Dustin M, Sakib R, | |
'''Can't make it:''' | '''Can't make it:''' | ||
[[Category:Meetings]] | [[Category:Meetings]] | ||
[[Category:AT Meetings]] | [[Category:AT Meetings]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:58, 20 July 2020
Back to Main Page >> Transverse Analysis Meetings
previous meeting << last meeting
Logistic information
BlueJeans calling instructions: Bluejeans link: https://bluejeans.com/494002155
Agenda
- Preliminary plots: Ciprian haplog4147
- KK: Interesting fact: Linear fit going through 0 is clearly inconsistent with data.
- KK: Interesting fact: The data is showing the Q dependence is power less than 1
- KK: Interesting fact: Ca40/48 sit on top of each other; it doesn't go to lower value (more N closer to Pb)
- KK: we are the only measurements that are fwd angle where the optical theorem works and we cleanly cut out the inelastic data (Si, Zr data don't have inelastic but are not fwd angle)
- KK: might be useful to make a plot * Z/A
- DM: the "high Q2" for the Pb data at 2GeV is probably related to the high C contamination. KK: agreed, we should make sure we correct this in the final publication.
- RyR: limited data on C1%, the data was taken before we moved the tgt encoder. CG: this should in principle would be ok. We should evaluate the to see if it gives us all we need or we need to get more data to get an appropriate error bar.
Present
Devi A, Kent P, KK, Paul K, Robert R, Ryan R, Weibin Z, Cameron C, Ciprian G, David A, Caryn P, Dustin M, Sakib R, Can't make it:
