Difference between revisions of "2020722-dithering"
From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (Created page with "== Agenda == *Update from Tao Y *To-do-list # average the e-vectors… can we find some general e-vectors… This would be a better way of comparing to HCBA over the run…....") |
(→Agenda) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
#* perhaps averaged over ranked e-vectors? | #* perhaps averaged over ranked e-vectors? | ||
#* force periods of fixed e-vectors | #* force periods of fixed e-vectors | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Present == | ||
| + | KK, Kent P, Paul S, Tao Y, Ye T, Victoria O | ||
Latest revision as of 11:23, 5 August 2020
Agenda
- Update from Tao Y
- To-do-list
- average the e-vectors… can we find some general e-vectors… This would be a better way of comparing to HCBA over the run…. (Tao)
- linearity (can be done with dithering data?). Ye.
- monitors?
- detectors?
- dither slope residuals (systematic? Precision?) - Tao.
- DD, US_AVG, Pitt vs slug noise…
- E-vector slope comparison (width?) vs slug, then compare to HC delta-X’s in those slugs (errors in slopes vs Delta X’s to help bound errors, in principle a short period with bad slopes could be a problem, we could tie down these unusual situations.)
- Averaging bpm differences
- perhaps averaged over ranked e-vectors?
- force periods of fixed e-vectors
Present
KK, Kent P, Paul S, Tao Y, Ye T, Victoria O
