Difference between revisions of "PREX/CREX May 11 2017 1:00pm EDT"

From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Back to [[Main_Page|Main Page]] >> [[PREX/CREX_Teleconferences]]  
 
Back to [[Main_Page|Main Page]] >> [[PREX/CREX_Teleconferences]]  
  
−
[[PREX/CREX_May_4_2017_1:00pm_EDT|previous meeting]] <<  >> [[PREX/CREX_May_18_2017_1:00pm_EDT|following meeting]]
+
[[PREX/CREX_May_4_2017_1:00pm_EDT|previous meeting]] <<  >> [[PREX/CREX_May_25_2017_1:00pm_EDT|following meeting]]
  
  
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
== Agenda ==
 
== Agenda ==
−
#Caryn: Q1 fringe calculation
+
#Caryn: Q1 fringe calculation [https://ace.phys.virginia.edu:80/HAPPEX/3409 haplog 3408]
−
#* comments
+
#* look at the slides in att7
−
#Juliette: Q1 fringe field in TOSCA
+
#* BM: where is the beam in the figures? KP: the center. on slide 2 the circles are the appertures for the Q1
 +
#* CP: the gradiants are 20% smaller
 +
#* SR: since everything is on the order of 10s of gaus/cm, so we should not worry about it. KP: this is a question because of the problems that APEX is having.
 +
#* KP: the point is that this should be good enough for the ERR if we don't have a full result from Juliette
 +
#* SR: we should calculate the field integral. KP: will do that.
 +
#Juliette: Q1 fringe field in TOSCA [https://ace.phys.virginia.edu:80/HAPPEX/3409 haplog 3409]
 +
#*JM: found a configuration that works in TOSCA. Now have fields for both quads and can get a field in between for each. They will cancel. Plan is to merge the 2 quads and 1 septum into a single simulation and run over night.
 +
#* JM: this is a simplified model. I would be confident to use this for optics. The stray field around the beamline is probably good enough.
 +
#* KP: asked to evaluate fields but no-one expects that to be a significant problem. Secondly evaluate if the fringe from the septum will produce another field with the iron in the Q1.
 +
# Kent (for Lorenzo): Activation plots [https://ace.phys.virginia.edu:80/HAPPEX/3410 haplog 3410]
 +
#* KP: he has some dose cycle (still need to get details). He shows in att3 after 1 month of cooldown. Red is 1000 rem/h/cm2.
 +
#* KP: it's not clear what the radiation from the beampipe is.
 +
#* SR: this is all on contact.
 +
#* KP: att 1 is the spectrum of stuff coming off the collimator (photons and electrons). According to this plot, beta is smaller and softer (below 1MeV). The gammas are about 100 times more.
 +
#* KP: Alan G has been working on how to remove this collimator. He has a nice way to do a flange that is similar to a clamp simplifying the de-installation process.
  
 
== Attendance ==
 
== Attendance ==
−
 
+
Tyler K, Tao Y, Juliette M, Kent P, Silviu C, Bob M, KK, Sanghwa P, Ciprian G, Caryn P, Dustin M,
 
=== Excused: ===
 
=== Excused: ===

Latest revision as of 10:56, 24 May 2017

Back to Main Page >> PREX/CREX_Teleconferences

previous meeting << >> following meeting


Logistic information

 BlueJeans calling instructions:
 Toll-Free Number (U.S.&  Canada):  888-240-2560
 International toll number:         408-740-7256
 PARTICIPANT CODE:                  913380354#
 Room IRL:                            CEBAF F227


Agenda

  1. Caryn: Q1 fringe calculation haplog 3408
    • look at the slides in att7
    • BM: where is the beam in the figures? KP: the center. on slide 2 the circles are the appertures for the Q1
    • CP: the gradiants are 20% smaller
    • SR: since everything is on the order of 10s of gaus/cm, so we should not worry about it. KP: this is a question because of the problems that APEX is having.
    • KP: the point is that this should be good enough for the ERR if we don't have a full result from Juliette
    • SR: we should calculate the field integral. KP: will do that.
  2. Juliette: Q1 fringe field in TOSCA haplog 3409
    • JM: found a configuration that works in TOSCA. Now have fields for both quads and can get a field in between for each. They will cancel. Plan is to merge the 2 quads and 1 septum into a single simulation and run over night.
    • JM: this is a simplified model. I would be confident to use this for optics. The stray field around the beamline is probably good enough.
    • KP: asked to evaluate fields but no-one expects that to be a significant problem. Secondly evaluate if the fringe from the septum will produce another field with the iron in the Q1.
  3. Kent (for Lorenzo): Activation plots haplog 3410
    • KP: he has some dose cycle (still need to get details). He shows in att3 after 1 month of cooldown. Red is 1000 rem/h/cm2.
    • KP: it's not clear what the radiation from the beampipe is.
    • SR: this is all on contact.
    • KP: att 1 is the spectrum of stuff coming off the collimator (photons and electrons). According to this plot, beta is smaller and softer (below 1MeV). The gammas are about 100 times more.
    • KP: Alan G has been working on how to remove this collimator. He has a nice way to do a flange that is similar to a clamp simplifying the de-installation process.

Attendance

Tyler K, Tao Y, Juliette M, Kent P, Silviu C, Bob M, KK, Sanghwa P, Ciprian G, Caryn P, Dustin M,

Excused:

Retrieved from "https://prex.jlab.org/wiki/index.php?title=PREX/CREX_May_11_2017_1:00pm_EDT&oldid=2098"