Difference between revisions of "20180424-Optics-Mtg"

From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "Back to Main Page >> HRS_Optics_Mtg previous meeting << >> following meeting == Logistic information...")
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
== Agenda ==
 
== Agenda ==
 +
[https://prex.jlab.org/cgi-bin/DocDB/private/ShowDocument?docid=137 Optics]
 +
[https://prex.jlab.org/DocDB/0001/000138/001/acceptance_and_tune.pdf g4hrs update]
  
 +
== Minutes ==
 +
* Tyler review collimator
 +
** Width of >8cm has diminishing returns on dR/R
 +
** Bottoming at out ~1.25% on dR/R with 2% systematic on A, 85% polarization
 +
** Getting 750MHz in single arm
 +
** Noticed that PREX-II proposal considered 925-1000 MeV beam and had 0.8% - likely the difference
 +
** Will look at trying to change collimator to smaller Q2 at expense of central angle
 +
** HPS will have sensitivity to our selected beam energy
  
== Minutes ==
+
* Ryan looking at transport and FP systems
 +
** Data look inconsistent as we understand transformation
 +
** Will look at in code with Seamus over next week
 +
** x offsets not understood either, likely just fot out
 +
*** Dipole not set correctly?

Latest revision as of 09:03, 25 April 2018

Back to Main Page >> HRS_Optics_Mtg


previous meeting << >> following meeting


Logistic information

 BlueJeans calling instructions:
 Toll-Free Number (U.S.&  Canada):  888-240-2560
 International toll number:         408-740-7256
 PARTICIPANT CODE:                  #9989030149
 Room IRL:                            <none>


Agenda

Optics g4hrs update

Minutes

  • Tyler review collimator
    • Width of >8cm has diminishing returns on dR/R
    • Bottoming at out ~1.25% on dR/R with 2% systematic on A, 85% polarization
    • Getting 750MHz in single arm
    • Noticed that PREX-II proposal considered 925-1000 MeV beam and had 0.8% - likely the difference
    • Will look at trying to change collimator to smaller Q2 at expense of central angle
    • HPS will have sensitivity to our selected beam energy
  • Ryan looking at transport and FP systems
    • Data look inconsistent as we understand transformation
    • Will look at in code with Seamus over next week
    • x offsets not understood either, likely just fot out
      • Dipole not set correctly?