Difference between revisions of "WAC Notes July 28 2019"

From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(35 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 32: Line 32:
 
** Applied '''bad_evt_cut'''->Now Good
 
** Applied '''bad_evt_cut'''->Now Good
 
* Good - [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/onlinePlots/index.php?run=summary/all/run3694_000 run3694]
 
* Good - [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/onlinePlots/index.php?run=summary/all/run3694_000 run3694]
* Good - [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/onlinePlots/index.php?run=summary/all/run3702_000 run2702]
+
* Good - [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/onlinePlots/index.php?run=summary/all/run3698_000 run3698]'''ADDED from suspicious list'''
 +
** User had marked it as Parity Scan. It is in fact a good production run
 +
* Good - [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/onlinePlots/index.php?run=summary/all/run3699_000 run3699]'''ADDED from suspicious list'''
 +
** Larger detector widths during minirun 0. Applied bad_evt_cut.
 +
* Good - [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/onlinePlots/index.php?run=summary/all/run3702_000 run3702]
 
** LQ1 tripped during 0th and 1st mini-runs
 
** LQ1 tripped during 0th and 1st mini-runs
 
** bad_evt_cut fixed it
 
** bad_evt_cut fixed it
 
* Good - [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/onlinePlots/index.php?run=summary/all/run3703_000 run3703]
 
* Good - [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/onlinePlots/index.php?run=summary/all/run3703_000 run3703]
 
** Short run
 
** Short run
 +
* Good - [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/onlinePlots/index.php?run=summary/all/run3706_000 run3706]'''ADDED from suspicious list'''
 +
** Moller Quad problem after this run
 +
* Good - [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/onlinePlots/index.php?run=summary/all/run3709_000 run3709]
 +
* Good - [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/onlinePlots/index.php?run=summary/all/run3710_000 run3710]
 +
* Good - [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/onlinePlots/index.php?run=summary/all/run3711_000 run3711]
  
 
== Non-Production Runs and Bad Runs ==
 
== Non-Production Runs and Bad Runs ==
* Bad - run3699
+
* Test - [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/onlinePlots/index.php?run=summary/all/run3700_000 run3700]
* Bad - run3700
 
 
** Double peak test
 
** Double peak test
* Junk - run3701
+
** Large Aq mean
* Junk - run3704
+
* Test - [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/onlinePlots/index.php?run=summary/all/run3704_000 run3704]
* Junk - run3705
+
* Bad - [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/onlinePlots/index.php?run=summary/all/run3705_000 run3705]
 +
** Big Aq mean for every minirun
 +
* Bad - [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/onlinePlots/index.php?run=summary/all/run3707_000 run3707]
 +
** Moller quad problem -> changed raster size
 +
* Bad - [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/onlinePlots/index.php?run=summary/all/run3708_000 run3708]
 +
** Moller Quad problem -> changed raster size
  
 
== Pedestal/Calibrations Updates ==
 
== Pedestal/Calibrations Updates ==
Line 51: Line 64:
 
* Parity Scan - [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/onlinePlots/index.php?run=summary/all/run3697_000 run3697]
 
* Parity Scan - [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/onlinePlots/index.php?run=summary/all/run3697_000 run3697]
 
** RHWP=500, RTP cell OFF
 
** RHWP=500, RTP cell OFF
* Parity Scan - [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/onlinePlots/index.php?run=summary/all/run3698_000 run3698]
+
* Parity Scan - [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/onlinePlots/index.php?run=summary/all/run3695_000 run3695]
 +
* Parity Scan - [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/onlinePlots/index.php?run=summary/all/run3700_000 run3701]
  
 
== Issues ==
 
== Issues ==

Latest revision as of 12:48, 25 September 2019

Documentation
HOW TOs for shift crew
Expert Tools
All Expert Contacts



PREX Main << Weekly Analysis Coordinator << WAC Notes << Instructions

WAC Notes July 27 2019 << >> WAC Notes July 29 2019

July 28 2019

Daily Meeting BlueJeans

Production Run List

    • Since we are using bcm_dg_ds, the width in the bcm asymmetry is 2X of what we had with bcm_an_ds
    • Should we think about changing saturation limit for this SAM?
    • If we compare with 70uA good run from previous slug, yield of SAMs on Right Hand Side has increased while on the other side decreased

Start Slug 18, IHWP IN, FFB on always

  • Good - run3692
  • Good - run3693
    • LQ1 tripped during the mini-run 0 and mini-run 1
    • Applied bad_evt_cut->Now Good
  • Good - run3694
  • Good - run3698ADDED from suspicious list
    • User had marked it as Parity Scan. It is in fact a good production run
  • Good - run3699ADDED from suspicious list
    • Larger detector widths during minirun 0. Applied bad_evt_cut.
  • Good - run3702
    • LQ1 tripped during 0th and 1st mini-runs
    • bad_evt_cut fixed it
  • Good - run3703
    • Short run
  • Good - run3706ADDED from suspicious list
    • Moller Quad problem after this run
  • Good - run3709
  • Good - run3710
  • Good - run3711

Non-Production Runs and Bad Runs

  • Test - run3700
    • Double peak test
    • Large Aq mean
  • Test - run3704
  • Bad - run3705
    • Big Aq mean for every minirun
  • Bad - run3707
    • Moller quad problem -> changed raster size
  • Bad - run3708
    • Moller Quad problem -> changed raster size

Pedestal/Calibrations Updates

Issues

  • Prompt analysis went too slow during swing and owl shift

Other Status Updates