Difference between revisions of "20191118-PREX2-Analysis"
From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (→Agenda) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
# PREX-2 runlist spreadsheet: [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Y6qR_h4oW4qNmbtdpo2TIX2u_TI5qjRUZIDyEroMfl0/edit#gid=218524552] [https://github.com/leafybillow/prex-runlist Github repo] | # PREX-2 runlist spreadsheet: [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Y6qR_h4oW4qNmbtdpo2TIX2u_TI5qjRUZIDyEroMfl0/edit#gid=218524552] [https://github.com/leafybillow/prex-runlist Github repo] | ||
− | #* | + | #* There were a few runs that Cameron still hadn't changed from needs cuts, but that was because they had required some custom tuning of burp/stability that changed after the burp bug was fixed. He wasn't sure how best to deal with them yet. |
+ | #* I think we should go ahead and move forward without worrying about tweaking cuts yet. Respin1 will give us a survey of all the runs, and we can reconsider changes that might go in for a respin2 | ||
+ | #* As we do the respin, the RCDB will have a new comment field that we can use to describe changes based on respin analysis | ||
# Tao : additional combined plots looking at statistical self-consistency [https://github.com/leafybillow/prex-archive Git-repo] | # Tao : additional combined plots looking at statistical self-consistency [https://github.com/leafybillow/prex-archive Git-repo] | ||
#* | #* | ||
# Weibin and Tao: table of cuts. [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16558eb2Dzvj3cQU7qVttCbvvyVldmV0tvzKSemPSve4/edit?usp=sharing] | # Weibin and Tao: table of cuts. [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16558eb2Dzvj3cQU7qVttCbvvyVldmV0tvzKSemPSve4/edit?usp=sharing] | ||
− | #* | + | #* I think we're basically ready with the cuts. |
# Robert: pedestals | # Robert: pedestals | ||
− | #* | + | #* He had raised a question on slack about uncommited files on the adaq cluster |
+ | #* Need to check on the blinded PMT and stubby test runs | ||
+ | #* There are some single-run channel maps for the beamline; Caryn thinks they may be PITA scans. We should check | ||
# Victoria: beam modulation (raw data quality, residuals) | # Victoria: beam modulation (raw data quality, residuals) | ||
− | #* | + | #* Paul will work with Victoria today to get the belssed slopes brought in as new corrector definitions for the respin |
# Devi: blinded tubes | # Devi: blinded tubes | ||
− | #* | + | #* Devi will get beam-off pedestal files ready for all of the blinded-tube runs. |
− | # Devika BCM | + | #* Last week, he had shown a discrepancy between the yield ratios and the asymmetry width changes between normal and blinded-pmt runs. He looked at the event signal distribution in [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/3935 HAPPEX Log 3935]. Need to check for overflow events |
− | #* | + | # BCM & DD resolution; stripline and cavity and complementary bpm resolution and performance. |
+ | #* Yufan and Devika are working on these together; Devika is focused on BPM resolution, and Yufan is on the BCM resolution | ||
+ | #* Devika is looking at the 4A abd 4E normal and complement BPM resolution and combinations of them | ||
# Overloaded regression (Tao?) | # Overloaded regression (Tao?) | ||
− | #* | + | #* The overloaded regression has been set up on the ifarm |
− | # Multiplet plots: [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/ | + | #** Std: five beam monitors as variables |
− | #* | + | #** Overloaded: All BPMs in the hall line |
− | # | + | #** "Dithering Energy": 4A, 4E, and the dithering-based combination of 11 and 12 for energy |
− | #* | + | #* The Langrange analysis first pass is also set up on the ifarm machines; once respin1 is done we would be able to evaluate stable slope periods for Lagrange analysis similar to the "belssed slopes" for dithering |
− | + | # Multiplet plots: [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/3936 haplog3936] | |
− | + | #* The 50uA plots have broad tails. Is that dues to beam current cuts, or something else? Actually, when the single arm runs are excluded, the tails drop | |
+ | #* Dithering distributions have large tails for both 50uA and 70uA running. Maybe this is coming from slugs where dithering slopes have a transition in the middle of the run? | ||
+ | #* Next would a set of left-arm and right-arm plots for all runs when those arms are working. | ||
== Present == | == Present == | ||
+ | Paul, Ryan, Devi, Robert R., Tao, Dmitri, Weibin | ||
+ | |||
+ | Phone: Cameron, Caryn, Ciprian, Jinlong, Kent, Sanghwa, Yufan, Devika | ||
===Excused=== | ===Excused=== |
Latest revision as of 12:13, 18 November 2019
Back to Main Page >> PREX2_Analysis
previous meeting << >> following meeting
Logistic information
Meeting room at JLab: CC B101
BlueJeans calling instructions: Toll-Free Number (U.S.& Canada): 888-240-2560 International toll number: 408-740-7256 Bluejeans CODE: 385 600 867 Bluejeans link: https://bluejeans.com/385600867
This meeting immediately preceeds the JAPAN meeting, and uses the same room and BlueJeans reservations.
Agenda
- PREX-2 runlist spreadsheet: [1] Github repo
- There were a few runs that Cameron still hadn't changed from needs cuts, but that was because they had required some custom tuning of burp/stability that changed after the burp bug was fixed. He wasn't sure how best to deal with them yet.
- I think we should go ahead and move forward without worrying about tweaking cuts yet. Respin1 will give us a survey of all the runs, and we can reconsider changes that might go in for a respin2
- As we do the respin, the RCDB will have a new comment field that we can use to describe changes based on respin analysis
- Tao : additional combined plots looking at statistical self-consistency Git-repo
- Weibin and Tao: table of cuts. [2]
- I think we're basically ready with the cuts.
- Robert: pedestals
- He had raised a question on slack about uncommited files on the adaq cluster
- Need to check on the blinded PMT and stubby test runs
- There are some single-run channel maps for the beamline; Caryn thinks they may be PITA scans. We should check
- Victoria: beam modulation (raw data quality, residuals)
- Paul will work with Victoria today to get the belssed slopes brought in as new corrector definitions for the respin
- Devi: blinded tubes
- Devi will get beam-off pedestal files ready for all of the blinded-tube runs.
- Last week, he had shown a discrepancy between the yield ratios and the asymmetry width changes between normal and blinded-pmt runs. He looked at the event signal distribution in HAPPEX Log 3935. Need to check for overflow events
- BCM & DD resolution; stripline and cavity and complementary bpm resolution and performance.
- Yufan and Devika are working on these together; Devika is focused on BPM resolution, and Yufan is on the BCM resolution
- Devika is looking at the 4A abd 4E normal and complement BPM resolution and combinations of them
- Overloaded regression (Tao?)
- The overloaded regression has been set up on the ifarm
- Std: five beam monitors as variables
- Overloaded: All BPMs in the hall line
- "Dithering Energy": 4A, 4E, and the dithering-based combination of 11 and 12 for energy
- The Langrange analysis first pass is also set up on the ifarm machines; once respin1 is done we would be able to evaluate stable slope periods for Lagrange analysis similar to the "belssed slopes" for dithering
- The overloaded regression has been set up on the ifarm
- Multiplet plots: haplog3936
- The 50uA plots have broad tails. Is that dues to beam current cuts, or something else? Actually, when the single arm runs are excluded, the tails drop
- Dithering distributions have large tails for both 50uA and 70uA running. Maybe this is coming from slugs where dithering slopes have a transition in the middle of the run?
- Next would a set of left-arm and right-arm plots for all runs when those arms are working.
Present
Paul, Ryan, Devi, Robert R., Tao, Dmitri, Weibin
Phone: Cameron, Caryn, Ciprian, Jinlong, Kent, Sanghwa, Yufan, Devika