Difference between revisions of "WAC Notes February 16 2020"

From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 41: Line 41:
 
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6432_000 Run 6432]
 
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6432_000 Run 6432]
 
** No loss in 0l02
 
** No loss in 0l02
 +
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run6433_000 Run 6433]
 +
** Some excursion in 0i01Y
  
 
== Non-Production Runs and Bad Runs ==
 
== Non-Production Runs and Bad Runs ==

Revision as of 08:39, 16 February 2020

Documentation
HOW TOs for shift crew
Expert Tools
All Expert Contacts



PREX Main << Weekly Analysis Coordinator << WAC Notes CREX << Instructions

WAC Notes February 15 2020 << >> WAC Notes February 17 2020

February 16 2020

Daily Meeting BlueJeans


Production Run List - Slug 135 - IHWP OUT - Flip-RIGHT - Production

start this slug at the end of Swing shift, February 16 after a long down (waiting for HALL B pass change)

  • Need Cut - Run 6424
    • User_Comment says checking blinder, and marked as Junk run but is a Production run on Ca-48 target
    • ~30uA loss in 0l02 starting this run. Aq is quite large, excursion in 0i02 (injector clipping?) in the second half of the run
    • Larger energy slopes comparing with production running before but is at the same level where we left during A_T measurements
    • An outlier in ATL1
  • Good - Run 6427
  • Need Cut? - Run 6428
    • Only a few thousands of Good Events. Quite large Aq and excursion in 0i02 in the beginning
    • Raster current changed
  • Good - Run 6429
  • Good - Run 6430
    • Large (~-11%) residual correlation of USL with AqUS
  • Good - Run 6431
    • 150uA and 140uA beam
  • Good - Run 6432
    • No loss in 0l02
  • Good - Run 6433
    • Some excursion in 0i01Y

Non-Production Runs and Bad Runs

  • run6425 is in C-Hole
  • run6426 is in C-Hole, but rcdb says "Production"

Pedestal/Calibrations Updates

Issues

Updates