Difference between revisions of "HRS Analysis"

From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
Line 32: Line 32:
 
* Target implementation is simplistic in G4HRS (and needs to be update to do diamond foil + Pb simultaneously)
 
* Target implementation is simplistic in G4HRS (and needs to be update to do diamond foil + Pb simultaneously)
 
* Inelastic states may need additional attention in G4HRS
 
* Inelastic states may need additional attention in G4HRS
 +
* Difficult to recreate the hard collimator cut seen in the data with G4HRS

Revision as of 23:00, 30 June 2020

PREX Main

Portal for HRS, Counting Mode, Optics, data and simulation notes and meetings

Useful Notes

HRS Analyses

Analyses Projects

  • Optics Database Tuning - Ryan, Siyu, etc.
  • Acceptance Function - Ryan, Chandan, Bob, etc.
    • PREX I notes from Bob
    • Average Q^2 from Analyzer and Simulation - Devi, Ryan, Dustin
    • Inelastic backgrounds and contamination - Ryan, Devi, Hanjie
    • Radiative corrections for APV extraction - Hanjie
  • AT extraction, verification in Analyzer and Simulation - Ryan, Devi, etc.
  • Rescattering, Pole Tip backgrounds, and more - Devi, Bob, etc.

Outstanding Issues

  • Super-elastic tail in G4HRS simulation but not in the Analyzer data
  • Related, questionable quad magnetic field implementation in G4HRS (see some of Tyler's notes above for reference)
  • Raster / BPM corrections for Analyzer Database
  • Consider two ways of tuning HRS database w/ & w/o septum co-tune
  • Are radiative corrections handled properly in G4HRS
  • Target implementation is simplistic in G4HRS (and needs to be update to do diamond foil + Pb simultaneously)
  • Inelastic states may need additional attention in G4HRS
  • Difficult to recreate the hard collimator cut seen in the data with G4HRS