Difference between revisions of "WAC Notes March 9 2021"
From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (Created page with "{| class="wikitable" border="1" style="width:100%; text-align:center;border-collapse:collapse" |- ! style="width:10%"| [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/rcdb/ RCDB] ! style="width:1...") |
m (→March 9th 2021) |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
** Double check PITA scans from respin1 data and BPM calibrations separately | ** Double check PITA scans from respin1 data and BPM calibrations separately | ||
* Aq shift - [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4489 solved] | * Aq shift - [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4489 solved] | ||
| − | + | * [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4482 Questions on AT data-set] (similar to Aq issue) | |
== March 2nd 2021 == | == March 2nd 2021 == | ||
Revision as of 10:05, 9 March 2021
| RCDB | HALOG | HAPLOG | DocDB | Online Prompt | BlueJeans Link | Runlist spreadsheet, respin 1 spreadsheet |
|---|
PREX Main << Weekly Analysis Coordinator << WAC Notes CREX << WAC Post-Run_Meeting Notes
WAC Notes March 2 2021 << >> WAC Notes March 16 2021
Organization
Date and time: March 9, 2021, 11am
Bluejeans ID: 564945377
Meeting link: https://bluejeans.com/564945377
Runlist spreadsheet
March 9th 2021
Preparing for respin2
- Pedestal updates
- Use beam off for non-RF systems
- Verify segmentation and values for RF systems
- Refer to beam off pedestals for guidance on applicability ranges
- Double check PITA scans from respin1 data and BPM calibrations separately
- Aq shift - solved
- Questions on AT data-set (similar to Aq issue)
March 2nd 2021
Preparing for respin2
- Pedestals/new beam trip cut/Aq interrelation question
- Aq post-trip studies: http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4483
- Things look good when comparing the different time slices post-trip recovery - more plots are needed to determine how well the non-feedback data post-trip explains the shift in Aq from prompt to respin1 data set.
- Pedestal comparisons for AT: http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4482
- Changing from prompt (wrong) to respin1 (relative to bcm calibrated) pedestals changed the mean asyms by an expected ~3% per target, EXCEPT for Pb208, which changed by ~15%. This needs further investigation to understand why Pb pedestal change affected the asyms so much.
- Aq post-trip studies: http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4483
February 23rd 2021
Prior day's notes can be found here
Attendence
Cameron, Victoria, Paul King, Allison Zec, Juliette, Weibin, Ryan, Devi, Kent
