Difference between revisions of "PREX/CREX Aug 3 2017 11:00am EDT"
From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchCiprian Gal (talk | contribs) |
Ciprian Gal (talk | contribs) (→Agenda) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
+ | # Ciprian: septum pipe [https://prex.jlab.org/wiki/images/4/4b/170803_SeptumBeamPipe_CGal.pdf slides] | ||
+ | #* CG: Jay made an implementation that shows almost complete reduction of the fringe field at the center of the Septum for CREX. | ||
# Ciprian: dump configuration, radiation calculation [https://prex.jlab.org/wiki/images/4/45/170802_PREX_Dump_CGal.pdf slides] | # Ciprian: dump configuration, radiation calculation [https://prex.jlab.org/wiki/images/4/45/170802_PREX_Dump_CGal.pdf slides] | ||
− | #* | + | #* GU: to verify that the thickness of the PREX1 apperture plate/diffuser is to blame for the increased radiation damage we should run with a thinner apperture (like the PREX2 donut) and see what we get. |
− | # | + | #* SR: it looks like a larger apperture and shielding would be the ideal configuration. We should include the new fringe field from Jay to see how it changes things (it should improve things significantly). |
− | #* | + | #* PS: Do we know where PREX1 damage came from (target, collimator, dump, beampipe)? CG: don't have numbers on hand now, will look it up. |
+ | #* PS: could you provide NEIL vs energy distributions for e/gamma and neutrons? CG: will update slides and send them over later today. | ||
== Attendance == | == Attendance == |
Revision as of 15:23, 3 August 2017
Back to Main Page >> PREX/CREX_Teleconferences
previous meeting << >> following meeting
Logistic information
BlueJeans calling instructions: Toll-Free Number (U.S.& Canada): 888-240-2560 International toll number: 408-740-7256 PARTICIPANT CODE: 913380354# Room IRL: CEBAF F227
Agenda
- Ciprian: septum pipe slides
- CG: Jay made an implementation that shows almost complete reduction of the fringe field at the center of the Septum for CREX.
- Ciprian: dump configuration, radiation calculation slides
- GU: to verify that the thickness of the PREX1 apperture plate/diffuser is to blame for the increased radiation damage we should run with a thinner apperture (like the PREX2 donut) and see what we get.
- SR: it looks like a larger apperture and shielding would be the ideal configuration. We should include the new fringe field from Jay to see how it changes things (it should improve things significantly).
- PS: Do we know where PREX1 damage came from (target, collimator, dump, beampipe)? CG: don't have numbers on hand now, will look it up.
- PS: could you provide NEIL vs energy distributions for e/gamma and neutrons? CG: will update slides and send them over later today.
Attendance
Excused:
Kent P, KK