Difference between revisions of "GEM Meeting/20190125"
From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 19: | Line 19: | ||
* Trying to find another way to cross check the analysis steps | * Trying to find another way to cross check the analysis steps | ||
* GEM multiplicities appear to be systematically ~15% lower than QDC multiplicities | * GEM multiplicities appear to be systematically ~15% lower than QDC multiplicities | ||
+ | ** There is a clear correlation of QDC mult to GEM mult, though probably the GEM efficiency is too low and pedestals are maybe an issue too | ||
+ | * There appears to be a bimodal behavior of events - events with a clear spike in the GEM and low RMS, and events with no clear spike in the GEM and high RMS (and often a large multiplicity in the QDC) | ||
+ | ** It would be nice to see if separating these two kinds of events and looking at just the low RMS ones would clean up the correlation of multiplicities between GEM and QDC | ||
+ | * Cross-talk slides are also uploaded in the same entry as the pedestal studies entry | ||
== Present == | == Present == |
Revision as of 16:32, 25 January 2019
Back to Main Page >> GEM_Meeting
Logistic information
BlueJeans calling instructions: Toll-Free Number (U.S.& Canada): 888-240-2560 International toll number: 408-740-7256 Bluejeans CODE: 998 903 0149 Bluejeans link: https://bluejeans.com/9989030149
Agenda
Minutes
Tao - SLAC analysis update, quantifying differences between QDC and GEM multiplicities, and GEM pedestal studies (ask Cameron for SLAC test beam user account on ELOG):
- Verified that all data is complete in QDC and GEM (no missed events in one or the other)
- Cross checked Decoder with event counter
- Two data words encoding event number added to decoder to double check event counts
- QDC index starts at 0, GEM MPD index starts at 1, so we expect an offset by one in these event counters
- Two data words encoding event number added to decoder to double check event counts
- Trying to find another way to cross check the analysis steps
- GEM multiplicities appear to be systematically ~15% lower than QDC multiplicities
- There is a clear correlation of QDC mult to GEM mult, though probably the GEM efficiency is too low and pedestals are maybe an issue too
- There appears to be a bimodal behavior of events - events with a clear spike in the GEM and low RMS, and events with no clear spike in the GEM and high RMS (and often a large multiplicity in the QDC)
- It would be nice to see if separating these two kinds of events and looking at just the low RMS ones would clean up the correlation of multiplicities between GEM and QDC
- Cross-talk slides are also uploaded in the same entry as the pedestal studies entry
Present
Chandan, Cameron, Seamus, Brady Lowe, Bryan Moffit, Dustin, Devi, Joey McCullough, Ryan Richards, Siyu, Tao, Carlos