Difference between revisions of "PREX2AuxiliaryMeasurements"
From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchKent Paschke (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<br> <B>PREX Main</B> == PREX-2 Auxiliary Measurements == == Optics and Q2 == # <font color="blue">Energy Measurement </font> (Bob, talk to Doug) #* look fo...") |
Kent Paschke (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
## <font color="blue">shift beam +/- 4mm in horizontal , retake dp = 0 optics </font> | ## <font color="blue">shift beam +/- 4mm in horizontal , retake dp = 0 optics </font> | ||
## <font color="blue">use 90 degree Carbon target </font> | ## <font color="blue">use 90 degree Carbon target </font> | ||
− | # <font color="blue"></font> | + | # <font color="blue">Cavity vs Striplines</font> |
− | # <font color="blue"></font> | + | #* measure carbon hole location with 50nA cavity lock and spot++ |
− | # <font color="blue"></font> | + | #* measure carbon hole with 0.5uA tgt lock and spot++ |
+ | #* show these are the same, within a 1mm or so | ||
+ | # <font color="blue">Q2 from damaged target</font> | ||
+ | #* measure Q2 from most damaged target (Pb10?) | ||
+ | #* compare to Q2 from pristine target | ||
+ | #* If these are different - we need a plan to correct for damage or measure all used targets | ||
+ | # <font color="blue">Dynamic Thermal-Induced Density Rearrangement </font> | ||
+ | #* Sieve in. S0 on, GEMs on, VDC Off. Production raster. | ||
+ | #* 1uA | ||
+ | #* Pb10 | ||
+ | #* Measure scattering density over target x vs y | ||
+ | #* 70uA | ||
+ | #* Repeat measurement of scattering density over target x vs y | ||
+ | #* If different, do the same on a pristine target | ||
+ | #* Evaluate Q2 for each case | ||
== Backgrounds == | == Backgrounds == |
Revision as of 15:47, 17 August 2019
PREX-2 Auxiliary Measurements
Optics and Q2
- Energy Measurement (Bob, talk to Doug)
- look for 1e-3 accuracy. Non invasive?
- VDC/GEM Rate study
- Detector counting mode.
- S0 trigger
- Lead target
- production raster and beam position
- Use cavity lock, low current
- start at low S0 rate (50kHz?) and go up in rate to 500 kHz, in several steps (50, 100, 200, 500 kHz)
- turn off VDC, continue up to 2MHz rates in GEMs (1MHz, 2MHz)
- Compare Q2 measurements at each rate from GEMS and VDC to look for rate dependence
- Optics Data
- Sieve in, VDC data. thin Carbon
- about 500k per run
- use target lock, about 1 uA
- Retake Optics including dp = 0, +-1% (scale all magnets)
- shift beam +/- 4mm in horizontal , retake dp = 0 optics
- use 90 degree Carbon target
- Cavity vs Striplines
- measure carbon hole location with 50nA cavity lock and spot++
- measure carbon hole with 0.5uA tgt lock and spot++
- show these are the same, within a 1mm or so
- Q2 from damaged target
- measure Q2 from most damaged target (Pb10?)
- compare to Q2 from pristine target
- If these are different - we need a plan to correct for damage or measure all used targets
- Dynamic Thermal-Induced Density Rearrangement
- Sieve in. S0 on, GEMs on, VDC Off. Production raster.
- 1uA
- Pb10
- Measure scattering density over target x vs y
- 70uA
- Repeat measurement of scattering density over target x vs y
- If different, do the same on a pristine target
- Evaluate Q2 for each case
Backgrounds
- Thin Lead Target to check for inelastics at high-resolution
- Previously done with different kinematics. could be repeated.
- Thin C12 to measure diamond background spectrum?
- Thick C12 to measure diamond background fraction?
- A_T detectors (Bob) Significant asymmetries found in A_T detectors, requires investigation
- Pole tip re-scattering Q2 or septum mis-tune, to increase interception on pole tip and improve poletip rescattering estimate
- Stubby Quartz (Dustin)
- Replace detector quartz with superelastic stub
- Integrating measurement
- Blank PMT (Dustin)
- Integrating measurement
- only if stubby quartz shows something
- Rescattering measurement
- repeat of previous measurements. Roughly 1 shift
- Detune spectrometer up in momentum, to dump elastic peak into spectrometer wall.
- Measure (integrating mode) signal in main detectors. Requires HV boot leg to get higher gain (is 10x possible?)
- should scale all spectrometer magnets _except_ Q3.
Detectors
- Linearity Studies (PITA + current scans) --
- Linearity Studies (LED) --
Moller polarimetry
- Repeat measurements - need enough granularity to track changing polarization. at least 2x/week = 6 measurements
Compton polarimetry
- No-target runs?
- Laser polarization optimization
- Laser polarization flip?
- linearity studies