Difference between revisions of "PREX2AuxiliaryMeasurements"

From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
 
#* Can be performed Day shift Monday or Tuesday?
 
#* Can be performed Day shift Monday or Tuesday?
 
#* look for 1e-3 accuracy. Non invasive.
 
#* look for 1e-3 accuracy. Non invasive.
# <font color="blue">Optics Data</font> (Cip)  (1-1.5 shifts)
+
# <font color="maroon">Optics Data</font> (Cip)  (1-1.5 shifts)
 
#* requires access to prepare, about 8-10 hrs data, access to backout  
 
#* requires access to prepare, about 8-10 hrs data, access to backout  
 
#* Sieve in, VDC data.  thin Carbon
 
#* Sieve in, VDC data.  thin Carbon
Line 15: Line 15:
 
#* no raster
 
#* no raster
 
#* Does not (strictly) require counting mode quartz detectors
 
#* Does not (strictly) require counting mode quartz detectors
## <font color="blue">Beam position dependence </font>  Completed. (Got +/- 3mm)
+
## <font color="maroon">Beam position dependence </font>  Completed. (Got +/- 3mm)
 
##* shift beam +/- 4mm in horizontal , retake dp = 0 optics
 
##* shift beam +/- 4mm in horizontal , retake dp = 0 optics
## <font color="blue">Vertical beam position dependence </font> Completed
+
## <font color="maroon">Vertical beam position dependence </font> Completed
 
##* shift beam +/- 2mm in horizontal , and +/-3mm in vertical.  
 
##* shift beam +/- 2mm in horizontal , and +/-3mm in vertical.  
 
##* Used both thick and thin C targets due to small thin target size
 
##* Used both thick and thin C targets due to small thin target size
## <font color="blue">Target Z comparison</font> Completed
+
## <font color="maroon">Target Z comparison</font> Completed
 
##* use 90 degree Carbon target, Compare y-targ reconstruction to 45 degree carbon target
 
##* use 90 degree Carbon target, Compare y-targ reconstruction to 45 degree carbon target
## <font color="blue">Retake Optics Data</font> (Cip) (Completed)
+
## <font color="maroon">Retake Optics Data</font> (Cip) (Completed)
 
##* including dp = 0, +-1% (scale all magnets)
 
##* including dp = 0, +-1% (scale all magnets)
# <font color="blue">Dynamic Thermal-Induced Density Rearrangement </font> (Bob, Chandon, Siyu, Cip) (4 hours)
+
# <font color="maroon">Dynamic Thermal-Induced Density Rearrangement </font> (Bob, Chandon, Siyu, Cip) (4 hours)
 
#* <font color="red"> High Priority (unless we can measure significant density variation at low current) </font>
 
#* <font color="red"> High Priority (unless we can measure significant density variation at low current) </font>
 
#* requires access to prepare, 3 hrs data + analysis, access to backout
 
#* requires access to prepare, 3 hrs data + analysis, access to backout

Revision as of 16:13, 2 September 2019


PREX Main


Optics and Q2

  1. Energy Measurement (Doug) (non-invasive)
    • Priority High
    • Can be performed Day shift Monday or Tuesday?
    • look for 1e-3 accuracy. Non invasive.
  2. Optics Data (Cip) (1-1.5 shifts)
    • requires access to prepare, about 8-10 hrs data, access to backout
    • Sieve in, VDC data. thin Carbon
    • about 500k per run
    • use target lock, about 1 uA
    • no raster
    • Does not (strictly) require counting mode quartz detectors
    1. Beam position dependence Completed. (Got +/- 3mm)
      • shift beam +/- 4mm in horizontal , retake dp = 0 optics
    2. Vertical beam position dependence Completed
      • shift beam +/- 2mm in horizontal , and +/-3mm in vertical.
      • Used both thick and thin C targets due to small thin target size
    3. Target Z comparison Completed
      • use 90 degree Carbon target, Compare y-targ reconstruction to 45 degree carbon target
    4. Retake Optics Data (Cip) (Completed)
      • including dp = 0, +-1% (scale all magnets)
  3. Dynamic Thermal-Induced Density Rearrangement (Bob, Chandon, Siyu, Cip) (4 hours)
    • High Priority (unless we can measure significant density variation at low current)
    • requires access to prepare, 3 hrs data + analysis, access to backout
    • Sieve in. S0 on, GEMs on, VDC Off. Production raster.
    • Does not require counting mode in quartz detectors _except_ for actually measuring Q2
    • 1uA
    • Pb10
    • Measure scattering density over target x vs y
    • 70uA
    • Repeat measurement of scattering density over target x vs y
    • If different, do the same on a pristine target
    • Evaluate Q2 (for specific sieve holes?) in each case
  4. Cavity vs Striplines (Cip) (~1.5 hrs) summary
    • High Priority
    • measure carbon hole location with 50nA cavity lock and spot++
    • measure carbon hole with 0.5uA tgt lock and spot++
    • show these are the same, within a 1mm or so
  5. Final Q2 measurement (Bob, Chandon, Siyu, Dustin) (4 hours?)
    • Priority (?)
    • Repeat of Q2 measurement, with improved pedestal noise control. Requires long (1hr +) access to reduce noisy pedestals
    • Detector counting mode.
    • S0 trigger
    • Lead target
    • production raster and beam position
    • Use cavity lock, low current
  6. VDC/GEM Rate study (Bob, Chandon, Siyu)
    • Completed (awaiting results)
    • Requires access, 3 hrs data, access to back out
    • Detector counting mode.
    • S0 trigger
    • Lead target
    • production raster and beam position
    • Use cavity lock, low current
    • start at low S0 rate (50kHz?) and go up in rate to 500 kHz, in several steps (50, 100, 200, 500 kHz)
    • turn off VDC, continue up to 2MHz rates in GEMs (1MHz, 2MHz)
    • Compare Q2 measurements at each rate from GEMS and VDC to look for rate dependence
  7. Q2 from damaged target (Bob)
    • Completed (awaiting results)
    • measure Q2 from most damaged target (Pb10?)
    • compare to Q2 from pristine target
    • If these are different - we need a plan to correct for damage or measure all used targets
    • can be combined with previous study, add 1 hr for target move and measurement

Backgrounds

  1. Stubby Quartz / Blinded Quartz (Dustin) (4 hours?)
    • Very High priority. Wednesday Swing? Thursday Day?
    • Longish access to setup and back out, but short data taking period (production conditions).
    • Replace detector quartz with superelastic stub or blinding cap (alternate US/DS and L/R)
    • Integrating measurement. Could normalize increased gain just by lowering beam current in production condition.
    • If surprising results found, continue test or plan second test
  2. Rescattering measurement (Bob, Cip?) (~1 shift)
    • High Priority
    • repeat of previous measurements, but new optics and a crucial cross-check
    • Detune spectrometer up in momentum, to dump elastic peak into spectrometer wall.
    • Measure (integrating mode) signal in main detectors. Requires HV boot leg to get higher gain (is 10x possible?)
    • should scale all spectrometer magnets _except_ Q3.
  3. Thin Lead Target to check for inelastics at high-resolution (Bob) (~1.5 hour, including setup/backout)
    • Medium Priority Do if we can.
    • valuable illustration and cross-check for presentation/publication
    • Does NOT require detector counting mode - could be done anytime with low current running
  4. Pole tip re-scattering (Bob, Cip?)
    • Requires investigation or planning - do we have an idea here?
    • Q2 or septum mis-tune, to increase interception on pole tip and improve poletip rescattering estimate
  5. A_T detectors (Dustin)
    • Significant asymmetries found in A_T detectors, requires investigation and planning
  6. Thin C12 to measure diamond background spectrum? (Bob)
    • All our optics data was taken with this, so presumably we have enough for this measurement already
  7. Thick C12 to measure diamond background fraction? (nope - priority none)
    • I'm unclear on the value of this, since we are not set up terribly well for yields at very different rates, the radiation is so different, and I don't know how accurately the targets are known.

Detectors

  1. Linearity Studies (PITA + current scans) (Caryn)
    • These are ongoing - should continue regularly. ~ 1 hour every 3 days.
  2. Linearity LED tests
    • This will be studied off line

Other

  1. Sign check
    • run Moller, Compton, and parity DAQ for quick PITA scan
    • Have we already done this? Parasitic with any PITA scan

Moller polarimetry

  1. Repeat measurements
    • about 2x/week. Goal: 1-1.5 shifts per measurement.
    • need enough granularity to track changing polarization.
  2. IHWP IN/OUT
  3. Copper false/asymmetry
  4. Target uniformity

Compton polarimetry

  1. No-target runs
  2. Laser polarization optimization
  3. Laser polarization flip
  4. linearity studies