Difference between revisions of "WAC Notes December 14 2019"

Revision as of 11:21, 15 January 2020

Daily Meeting BlueJeans

Good - Run 5439 - plots - OK
Good - Run 5440 - plots - A bit noisy, but ok in positions
Good - Run 5441 - plots - A bit noisy, but ok in positions, cut out first 40k events to remove some BCM clipping
Good - Run 5442 - plots - A bit noisy, but ok in positions
Good - Run 5443 - plots - A bit noisy, but ok in positions
Good - Run 5444 - plots - A bit noisy, but ok in positions
Good - Run 5444 - plots - A bit noisy, but ok in positions
Good - Run 5446 - plots - A bit noisy, but ok in positions
Good - Run 5447 - plots - Cut out a lot of noisy beam in here
Good - Run 5448 - plots - Cut some noisy beam in here, 4 ppm Aq, but only 8k muls counted, so its OK
Good - Run 5449 - plots - Cutting 300k-380k for some beam excursion, main det widths increase a bit too
Good - Run 5450 - plots - 280k-350k cut to remove clipping... otherwise looks ok (with BPM Y issue all prior runs had too)
Good - Run 5451 - plots - back to lower widths, 400k->get cut for excursions
Good - Run 5453 - plots - Looks great

Bad - Run 5437 - https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run5437_000 plots] - Bad Aq
Burn in test - Run 5452 - plots - Burn in Ca48 some more

This slug has too much inelastic state in the main dets, causing < 740 ppm widths
FFB had some auto-gain issue that messed with the BPMs in beam recovery, especially in Y (I suspect)

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 '''Daily Meeting [https://bluejeans.com/454783784 BlueJeans]'''
-=== Production Run List - Slug 101 ===
+=== Production Run List - Slug 101 - IHWP IN, Flip RIGHT - Production ===
 * Good - Run 5439 - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run5439_000 plots] - OK