Difference between revisions of "WAC Notes January 25 2020"
From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchm |
|||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run5928_000 Run 5928] - Post detector alignment. Some beam motion but its mostly fine. | * Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run5928_000 Run 5928] - Post detector alignment. Some beam motion but its mostly fine. | ||
* Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run5929_000 Run 5929] - Looks good | * Good - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run5929_000 Run 5929] - Looks good | ||
| + | * NeedCut/Decision - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run5939_000 Run 5939] - Low Current. | ||
| + | * NeedCut/Decision - [https://prex.jlab.org/analysis/crex/index.php?run=summary/all/run5940_000 Run 5940] - Low Current. | ||
== Non-Production Runs and Bad Runs == | == Non-Production Runs and Bad Runs == | ||
Latest revision as of 11:42, 31 March 2020
| Documentation |
| HOW TOs for shift crew |
| Expert Tools |
| All Expert Contacts |
PREX Main << Weekly Analysis Coordinator << WAC Notes CREX << Instructions
WAC Notes January 24 2020 << >> WAC Notes January 26 2020
January 25 2020
Daily Meeting BlueJeans
Production Run List - Slug 115 - Ca48 - IHWP IN
- Good - Run 5915 - Calcium 48 production at last - cut BCM noisiness issue 0:40000 and 440000:
- Good - Run 5916 - Cutting out 80000:162000 for BCM Aq issue
- Good - Run 5917 - looks good. Cutting out 8000:40000 and 104000:152000 for BCM Aq issue
- Good - Run 5918 - looks good. Cutting 16000:32000 for Aq blow up issue
- Good - Run 5919 - Looks good
Production Run List - Slug 116 - Ca48 - IHWP OUT
- Good - Run 5921 - Looks good
- Good - Run 5922 - Looks good
- Good - Run 5923 - Looks good
- Good - Run 5924 - Main detectors moved x=-1.4mm both arms, looks good, some Aq clipping at the beginning, but OK
Production Run List - Slug 117 - Ca48 - IHWP OUT - detector alignment slug split
- Good - Run 5928 - Post detector alignment. Some beam motion but its mostly fine.
- Good - Run 5929 - Looks good
- NeedCut/Decision - Run 5939 - Low Current.
- NeedCut/Decision - Run 5940 - Low Current.
Non-Production Runs and Bad Runs
- Burn in/Thermal commissioning - Run 5910 - Calcium 48 90 uA burn in
- Burn in/Thermal commissioning - Run 5911 - Junk
- Burn in/Thermal commissioning - Run 5912 - Calcium 48 60-120 uA burn in
- Good Burn in/Thermal commissioning - Run 5913 - Calcium 48 120 uA burn in - data looks good
- Good Burn in/Thermal commissioning - Run 5914 - Calcium 48 120 uA burn in - data looks good
- Bad - Run 5920 - 120 uA, no Aq feedback, short run
Pedestal/Calibrations Updates
- https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mt39fCuIW3Pr8TO7fzhtFjmMFt4Op30jMm5wMQke6Xo/edit?usp=sharing
Issues
- Restoring production on Calcium after target restoration. Target burn in, etc.
- BMOD data is lacking from many runs, and some fix is needed to get properly useful data for these slugs after CREX II target is installed
