Difference between revisions of "20200720-Optics-Mtg"
From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchKent Paschke (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Back to Main Page >> HRS_Optics_Mtg previous meeting << >> following meeting == Logistic information ==...") |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
# Last weeks issues: | # Last weeks issues: | ||
#* Non-symmetric azimuthal angle acceptance distributions | #* Non-symmetric azimuthal angle acceptance distributions | ||
| − | #* instability in Q2 measurements over the PREX-2 run | + | #* instability in Q2 measurements over the PREX-2 run [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4180 Ryan] |
#* catalog of relevant parameters for Q2 runs (beam E, beam position, spectrometer dp, trigger hole?... others?) | #* catalog of relevant parameters for Q2 runs (beam E, beam position, spectrometer dp, trigger hole?... others?) | ||
#* Lead uniformity measurement vs. target lifetime (expected failure at end only) | #* Lead uniformity measurement vs. target lifetime (expected failure at end only) | ||
Revision as of 14:55, 20 July 2020
Back to Main Page >> HRS_Optics_Mtg
previous meeting << >> following meeting
Logistic information
Toll-Free Number (U.S.& Canada): 888-240-2560 PARTICIPANT CODE: # 585 129 220 Room IRL: <none> https://bluejeans.com/585129220
Agenda
Please post slides in haplog or docdb, before the meeting
- Last weeks issues:
- Non-symmetric azimuthal angle acceptance distributions
- instability in Q2 measurements over the PREX-2 run Ryan
- catalog of relevant parameters for Q2 runs (beam E, beam position, spectrometer dp, trigger hole?... others?)
- Lead uniformity measurement vs. target lifetime (expected failure at end only)
- Longstanding topics
- progress on MC simulation of acceptance function
- Carbon fraction
- ultimate precision of angle measurement
- evaluation of optics db reconstruction uncertainty to q2 / acceptance function systematic error
- inelastic contamination
