Difference between revisions of "20201002-Optics-Mtg"
From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchKent Paschke (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Back to Main Page >> HRS_Optics_Mtg previous meeting << >> following meeting == Logistic information ==...") |
Kent Paschke (talk | contribs) (→Agenda) |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
'''Please post slides in haplog or docdb, before the meeting''' | '''Please post slides in haplog or docdb, before the meeting''' | ||
− | # | + | # G4HRS: trying to make a sandwich target. Some glitchy-ness in dealing with the selection in the different density regions - Cip will review and we will establish. |
+ | # | ||
# Saturday, 11:30-4 is analysis summary meeting | # Saturday, 11:30-4 is analysis summary meeting | ||
− | |||
== Minutes == | == Minutes == | ||
== Attendence == | == Attendence == |
Latest revision as of 08:08, 3 October 2020
Back to Main Page >> HRS_Optics_Mtg
previous meeting << >> following meeting
Logistic information
Time: 12:30-1:30 Toll-Free Number (U.S.& Canada): 888-240-2560 PARTICIPANT CODE: #543 006 042 Room IRL: <none> https://bluejeans.com/543006042
Plan:
- Optics and Pointing
- Optics database. We need to get this in our hands so we can analyze Q2 data from over the run. (Near Done?)
- Pointing (Siyu) We need to get to final precision (Near Done)
- G4HRS and energy loss
- Estimate of ionization energy (constant) offset (Hanjie)
- Ionization straggling. This may require an improved vertex handling. Defered to post Oct 3.
- Acceptance function
- Build C-Pb-C sandwich targets in G4HRS. (Hanjie? Ryan? Cip?)
- Detector position sensitivity to analyzing power ("apparent" acceptance function from data) (Devi, Bob, Kent )
- Sensitivity study for acceptance function Q1 collimator cuts, or polar angle dist. (Devi, Bob, Kent )
- Verify sieve hole acceptance in septum scan (Ryan, Kent)
- Verify scattering angle correspondence MC vs data, perhaps central sieve hole? (Kent, Ryan)
- Vertex correction (Ryan, Kent)
- Carbon Background (Cip, Weibin)
- Carbon/Lead target thickness.
- Cross-check Carbon background. (Cip, Weibin)
- Simulate Carbon acceptance with radiative tail
- Separate Carbon/Pb distributions from sandwich targets
- Compare C12 acceptance to C12 distribution from Pb targets, for Q2 comparison.
- Calculate average carbon contamination fraction, and kinematics (for correction)
- Q2 data set (Hanjie, Chandan)
- runlist
- Q2/Acceptance function, multiple measurements. Run with new optics DB, compile results (Hanjie)
- Consider possible carbon thickness variation or acceptance function variation as a function of target lifetime (Chandan)
- Previous look at multiple Q2 runs: https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3728569
- With some additional care for the following:
- care for the detector cut
- Also plotting the scattering angle, expected asymmetry, and momentum, and perhaps Q2 calculated two ways (using angle/dp/incidentE and using angle/E_incident)
- We need to get incident E correct (average energy loss before vertex… just a number we will get from sim)
- keep track of the detector alignment, dp and spectrometer p0 so we know if variations imply a change in the acceptance function or just an alignment change
- keep track of beam position - this was a dominant source of variation in past runs, as one arm went up in Q2 and the other went down due to x-position differences
Agenda
Please post slides in haplog or docdb, before the meeting
- G4HRS: trying to make a sandwich target. Some glitchy-ness in dealing with the selection in the different density regions - Cip will review and we will establish.
- Saturday, 11:30-4 is analysis summary meeting