Difference between revisions of "WAC Notes August 12 2020"
From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (Created page with "{| cellpadding=5 style="margin:7px 30px 0 30px; <!-- --> float:right; border:1px solid #AA6633" |- bgcolor="#fbfeff" |- |Documentation |- | HOW TOs | HOW TOs for shif...") |
m |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
== Updates == | == Updates == | ||
| − | * Detectors are in exactly the same spots and conditions as in March | + | * Detectors are in exactly the same spots and conditions as in March - Devi's alignment check results - https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3825555 |
* Pedestals need to be obtained in a few days and these runs reprompted | * Pedestals need to be obtained in a few days and these runs reprompted | ||
[[Category:WAC]] | [[Category:WAC]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:22, 9 November 2020
| Documentation |
| HOW TOs for shift crew |
| Expert Tools |
| All Expert Contacts |
PREX Main << Weekly Analysis Coordinator << WAC Notes CREX << Instructions
WAC Notes August 11 2020 << >> WAC Notes August 13 2020
August 12 2020
Daily Meeting BlueJeans
Production Run List - Slug 187 - IHWP IN - Flip-RIGHT - Production/Recommissioning
- Suspicious - Run 7657 - First run after long down for hall work, injector work, and FFB recommissioning. There is clearly still some noise in the Y bpms, but not as much as yesterday. Really bad BPM jitter and noise, causing 5000ppm raw RHRS noise and inadequate regression... suspicious. Place a 12X cut at >-0.5
- Good - Run 7658 - Excursion, cut out 60k-80k for X and E BPMs. OPS changed gang phase which fixed up bad noise and beam instability issues. There is a large excursion at the beginning, but probably benign
- Good - Run 7660 - BPM Ys are still broad while FFB is on, but looks better now
- Good - Run 7661 - looks good
Non-Production Runs and Bad Runs
- Junk - Run 7659 - During alignment check with low current on Ca48
Issues
- FFB issues at the beginning of the shift, but Gang Phase adjustments seem to get it down to a manageable level
- There was concern over the RHRS having worse RMS regressed asymmetry
- There is a ~30 ppm worse RHRS width, due to LHRS having 3mm more acceptance of inelastics
- There was a false alarm of high width due to misusing 4aX BPM instead of 1X in the regressed histogram in panguin... oops!
- Devi took an alignment run (with no dpp...) and sees everything is almost exactly as it was in March
Updates
- Detectors are in exactly the same spots and conditions as in March - Devi's alignment check results - https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3825555
- Pedestals need to be obtained in a few days and these runs reprompted
