Difference between revisions of "BMOD 21July2021"
From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchm (→Attendence) |
m (→July 21) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
=== July 21 === | === July 21 === | ||
+ | Looking at results from respin 2 data: | ||
* dit - reg - lagr differences | * dit - reg - lagr differences | ||
* impact of including error bars on lagrange sensitivities | * impact of including error bars on lagrange sensitivities | ||
Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
* accumulated residuals (or, residual spread per slug RMS and averages) | * accumulated residuals (or, residual spread per slug RMS and averages) | ||
* net beam corrections (3 parts and slugwise) | * net beam corrections (3 parts and slugwise) | ||
+ | Tasks for next week: | ||
+ | * Try to zoom in on the parts where plain and eigen dit corrected asyms disagree | ||
+ | ** Double check the root files and slopes, etc. that there is nothing wrong in the analysis chain | ||
+ | ** The two methods should get identical corrected asyms | ||
+ | ** Verify no 1 arm running shenanigans or mislabeled data slipped in (and that run_avg == eigen_dit_run_avg_part_avgd) | ||
+ | * Look at where slopes disagree between dit - reg | ||
+ | ** Verify the corrections and/or monitorwise diff RMSs are small (so that if the slopes disagree it has negligible effect on the corrections being made) | ||
+ | ** Make slug_avg plots of the slope disagreements (including RMSs) | ||
+ | ** Make slug_avg plots of the corrections per monitor too | ||
+ | * Do a 12BPM Eigen Reg and Eigen Lagr comparison | ||
+ | ** See if the slopes agree better than the 5BPM case (where evMons 3 and 4 disagreed substantially between reg and dit) | ||
+ | * Provide easy to parse tables of the 5 evMon's corrections per 3 CREX parts (and make the error calculation math clear as well) | ||
+ | * Improve dit-reg-lagr plots | ||
+ | ** Add pull plots | ||
+ | ** Do slug averaging of these (including RMSs) | ||
+ | * Multipletwise and runwise diff plots being == is suspicious | ||
+ | ** Double check the plotting script isn't doing anything funny | ||
+ | ** Double check the source aggregator root file and input device list are correct | ||
+ | ** Double check the math by plotting the distributions by hand for some example runs | ||
=== July 14 === | === July 14 === |
Revision as of 17:06, 21 July 2021
BMOD_14July2021 << >> BMOD_28July2021
Logistic information
BlueJeans calling instructions: Toll-Free Number (U.S.& Canada): 888-240-2560 International toll number: 408-740-7256 Bluejeans CODE: 948942477 Bluejeans link: https://bluejeans.com/948942477
Agenda
July 21
Looking at results from respin 2 data:
- dit - reg - lagr differences
- impact of including error bars on lagrange sensitivities
- slope plots
- slope differences per monitor from different techniques (dit vs reg)
- accumulated residuals (or, residual spread per slug RMS and averages)
- net beam corrections (3 parts and slugwise)
Tasks for next week:
- Try to zoom in on the parts where plain and eigen dit corrected asyms disagree
- Double check the root files and slopes, etc. that there is nothing wrong in the analysis chain
- The two methods should get identical corrected asyms
- Verify no 1 arm running shenanigans or mislabeled data slipped in (and that run_avg == eigen_dit_run_avg_part_avgd)
- Look at where slopes disagree between dit - reg
- Verify the corrections and/or monitorwise diff RMSs are small (so that if the slopes disagree it has negligible effect on the corrections being made)
- Make slug_avg plots of the slope disagreements (including RMSs)
- Make slug_avg plots of the corrections per monitor too
- Do a 12BPM Eigen Reg and Eigen Lagr comparison
- See if the slopes agree better than the 5BPM case (where evMons 3 and 4 disagreed substantially between reg and dit)
- Provide easy to parse tables of the 5 evMon's corrections per 3 CREX parts (and make the error calculation math clear as well)
- Improve dit-reg-lagr plots
- Add pull plots
- Do slug averaging of these (including RMSs)
- Multipletwise and runwise diff plots being == is suspicious
- Double check the plotting script isn't doing anything funny
- Double check the source aggregator root file and input device list are correct
- Double check the math by plotting the distributions by hand for some example runs
July 14
- Respin 2 outputs
- Updated eigenvector definitions
- Dit + reg + lagrange using eigenvectors
- Residual sensitivities, done correctly this time
May 19
- Respin 2: Look at dit vs. reg differences - HAPLOG
- Look at respin2 dit-reg diff outputs
- Checked by eye the 4+ sigma outlier miniruns
- Respin 1: 3 CREX parts’ monitorwise net corrections (and uncertainties?) - HAPLOG
- Respin 1: Residual dithering sensitivities - HAPLOG
- Looking at plain BPMs, run_avg sensitivities
- Looking at eigenvector monitors, run_avg sensitivities
- Looking at plain BPMs, cyclewise sensitivities
- Fractional residuals (needs more work in respin2 outputs to clean up outliers) - HAPLOG
- Timescale dependent RMSs in asym->histogram filling - not discussed - HAPLOG
Attendence
Cameron, Paul, Kent, Victoria, Ye, Tao, Weibin