Difference between revisions of "20180605-Radiation-Mtg"

From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
== Agenda / Minutes ==
 
== Agenda / Minutes ==
# G4 sims:
+
# SAM sims: Cameron
#* comments
+
#* CC: have results (will be formatted better for tomorrow’s meeting) for thickness of can, quartz and radius offset
 
# Tao(SBU): SAM simulation Update[[File:20180605-Radiation-Mtg-TaoYe.pdf]]
 
# Tao(SBU): SAM simulation Update[[File:20180605-Radiation-Mtg-TaoYe.pdf]]
 +
#* TY: updated simulation to correct wrong target position and remove septum (for comparison with Gmp experiment). The rates are now different by a factor of 2. CG: that should be good enough for now, I would suggest you put back the collimator, septum, septum pipe and run a prex/crex simulation to get PE levels as a function of radius
  
 
== Attendance ==
 
== Attendance ==
 
+
Victoria O, Ciprian G, David A, Adam Z, Cameron C, Tao Y,
 
=== Excused: ===
 
=== Excused: ===
 +
Kent P,

Latest revision as of 09:35, 5 June 2018

Back to Main Page >> Radiation_Mtg

previous meeting << >> following meeting


Logistic information

 BlueJeans calling instructions:
   Toll-Free Number (U.S.&  Canada):  888-240-2560
   International toll number:         408-740-7256
   PARTICIPANT CODE:                  https://bluejeans.com/190761523


Agenda / Minutes

  1. SAM sims: Cameron
    • CC: have results (will be formatted better for tomorrow’s meeting) for thickness of can, quartz and radius offset
  2. Tao(SBU): SAM simulation UpdateFile:20180605-Radiation-Mtg-TaoYe.pdf
    • TY: updated simulation to correct wrong target position and remove septum (for comparison with Gmp experiment). The rates are now different by a factor of 2. CG: that should be good enough for now, I would suggest you put back the collimator, septum, septum pipe and run a prex/crex simulation to get PE levels as a function of radius

Attendance

Victoria O, Ciprian G, David A, Adam Z, Cameron C, Tao Y,

Excused:

Kent P,