Difference between revisions of "Target density variation check"
From PREX Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | == Run summary == | ||
* First measurement 09/02/2019 | * First measurement 09/02/2019 | ||
** [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3727894 HALOG summary] | ** [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3727894 HALOG summary] | ||
Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
** [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3728471 HALOG run summary] | ** [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3728471 HALOG run summary] | ||
** Consistency between LHRS and RHRS recovered for target #10 [https://userweb.jlab.org/~sanghwa/prex/running/dyn_dens3.pdf] | ** Consistency between LHRS and RHRS recovered for target #10 [https://userweb.jlab.org/~sanghwa/prex/running/dyn_dens3.pdf] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | == How to make plots == | ||
+ | * full replay macro can be found from: | ||
+ | /adaqfs/home/a-onl/sanghwa/stupid_spot/get_rastersize.C | ||
+ | |||
+ | * To run: | ||
+ | > analyzer -b -q 'get_rastersize.C(run#, first evt, last evt, "outputpath/outputname")' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Example: | ||
+ | > analyzer -b -q 'get_rastersize.C(2293, 1, -1, "rootfiles/L2293.root")' | ||
+ | |||
+ | * To draw raster current xy distribution: | ||
+ | ** /adaqfs/home/a-onl/sanghwa/stupid_spot/make_2D.C | ||
+ | > root -b | ||
+ | > .L make_2D.C | ||
+ | > plot_all("dyn_therm.list") | ||
+ | This will create dyn_dens.pdf. To open: | ||
+ | > evince dyn_dens.pdf & | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Input file format: | ||
+ | <LHRS run#> <LHRS file path> <RHRS run#> <RHRS file path> <current> <target#> |
Revision as of 14:40, 4 September 2019
Run summary
- First measurement 09/02/2019
- HALOG summary
- Target #7 and #10 were checked for current range 5-70uA
- Septum mistuned on purpose in order to reduce rates, T2 trigger is used
- Sieve in
- Clear non-uniformity observed from degraded target (#10) compared to good (still in use) target (#7).
- More visible at higher current, but hint of similar signature of density rearrangement seen at low current.
- Consistent results from both LHRS and RHRS spot data
- Second measurement 09/03/2019
- HALOG summary
- Took high statistics run at very low current (30nA requested), Target #10
- Septum at nominal setting, no Sieve
- Similar result shown in RHRS data as previous high current test
- Different distribution in LHRS is puzzling, might be related to DAQ problem
- Qsq runs 09/03/2019
- 400-500k events for LHRS and RHRS runs during Qsq measurements with various targets (Pb7, 8, 9, 10)
- HALOG run summary
- Consistency between LHRS and RHRS recovered for target #10 [1]
How to make plots
- full replay macro can be found from:
/adaqfs/home/a-onl/sanghwa/stupid_spot/get_rastersize.C
- To run:
> analyzer -b -q 'get_rastersize.C(run#, first evt, last evt, "outputpath/outputname")'
Example:
> analyzer -b -q 'get_rastersize.C(2293, 1, -1, "rootfiles/L2293.root")'
- To draw raster current xy distribution:
- /adaqfs/home/a-onl/sanghwa/stupid_spot/make_2D.C
> root -b > .L make_2D.C > plot_all("dyn_therm.list") This will create dyn_dens.pdf. To open: > evince dyn_dens.pdf &
- Input file format:
<LHRS run#> <LHRS file path> <RHRS run#> <RHRS file path> <current> <target#>