WAC Notes March 9 2021

From PREX Wiki
Revision as of 10:04, 9 March 2021 by Cameronc (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{| class="wikitable" border="1" style="width:100%; text-align:center;border-collapse:collapse" |- ! style="width:10%"| [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/rcdb/ RCDB] ! style="width:1...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search
RCDB HALOG HAPLOG DocDB Online Prompt BlueJeans Link Runlist spreadsheet, respin 1 spreadsheet

PREX Main << Weekly Analysis Coordinator << WAC Notes CREX << WAC Post-Run_Meeting Notes

WAC Notes March 2 2021 << >> WAC Notes March 16 2021

Organization

Date and time: March 9, 2021, 11am
Bluejeans ID: 564945377
Meeting link: https://bluejeans.com/564945377
Runlist spreadsheet

March 9th 2021

Preparing for respin2

  • Pedestal updates
    • Use beam off for non-RF systems
    • Verify segmentation and values for RF systems
    • Refer to beam off pedestals for guidance on applicability ranges
    • Double check PITA scans from respin1 data and BPM calibrations separately
  • Aq shift - solved


March 2nd 2021

Preparing for respin2

  • Pedestals/new beam trip cut/Aq interrelation question
    • Aq post-trip studies: http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4483
      • Things look good when comparing the different time slices post-trip recovery - more plots are needed to determine how well the non-feedback data post-trip explains the shift in Aq from prompt to respin1 data set.
    • Pedestal comparisons for AT: http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/HAPPEX/4482
      • Changing from prompt (wrong) to respin1 (relative to bcm calibrated) pedestals changed the mean asyms by an expected ~3% per target, EXCEPT for Pb208, which changed by ~15%. This needs further investigation to understand why Pb pedestal change affected the asyms so much.

February 23rd 2021

Prior day's notes can be found here

Attendence

Cameron, Victoria, Paul King, Allison Zec, Juliette, Weibin, Ryan, Devi, Kent