Difference between revisions of "Final analysis"

From PREX Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with '=Compton= Mindy's HAPLOG post: http://ace.phys.virginia.edu:8080/HAPPEX/2582 Final result: 87.41 +/- 0.12 (stat) +/- 1.51 (sys) % chi^2/NDoF = 1.09 for 13 points over the ex…')
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
=Polarimetry=
 +
 +
Compton
 +
 +
87.41 +/- 0.12 (stat) +/- 1.77 (sys) %
 +
 +
Moller
 +
 +
88.92 +/- 0.04 (stat) +/- 1.12 (sys) %
 +
 
=Compton=
 
=Compton=
  
Line 5: Line 15:
 
http://ace.phys.virginia.edu:8080/HAPPEX/2582
 
http://ace.phys.virginia.edu:8080/HAPPEX/2582
  
Final result:  87.41 +/- 0.12 (stat) +/- 1.51 (sys) %
+
Final result:  87.41 +/- 0.12 (stat) +/- 1.77 (sys) % (??)
  
 
chi^2/NDoF = 1.09 for 13 points over the experiment
 
chi^2/NDoF = 1.09 for 13 points over the experiment
Line 14: Line 24:
 
|-
 
|-
 
!  
 
!  
! Uncer. (%)
+
! Rel Uncer. (%)
 
!
 
!
 
|-
 
|-
Line 34: Line 44:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Analyzing Power
 
| Analyzing Power
| 0.02
+
| 1.53
 
|  
 
|  
 +
|-
 +
| TOTAL
 +
| 2.03
 
|}
 
|}
  
Line 67: Line 80:
 
w/ the radiative correction:
 
w/ the radiative correction:
 
  analyzing power = 0.018299996 +- 0.00002583 (sta.) +- 0.000279099 (sys.)
 
  analyzing power = 0.018299996 +- 0.00002583 (sta.) +- 0.000279099 (sys.)
 +
 +
 +
=Moller=
 +
 +
http://www.jlab.org/~moller/e02-006.html
 +
 +
Final result weighted average:  88.92 +/- 0.04 (stat) +/- 1.12 (sys) %
 +
 +
(not sure if the systematic is relative or absolute)
 +
 +
==Systematic Error==
 +
 +
Sasha's report at the Jan 2011 collaboration meeting
 +
http://www.jlab.org/~moller/docs/PREX_Col_01_29_2011.pdf
 +
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|-
 +
!
 +
! Uncer. (%)
 +
|-
 +
| Fe Pol.
 +
| 0.25
 +
|-
 +
| Targ Discrep.
 +
| 0.5
 +
|-
 +
| Targ Saturation
 +
| 0.3
 +
|-
 +
| Analyzing power
 +
| 0.3
 +
|-
 +
| Levchuk
 +
| 0.5
 +
|-
 +
| Targ temp
 +
| 0.02
 +
|-
 +
| Dead time
 +
| 0.3
 +
|-
 +
| Background
 +
| 0.3
 +
|-
 +
| Others
 +
| 0.5
 +
|-
 +
| Current diff
 +
| 0.3
 +
|-
 +
| TOTAL
 +
| 1.12
 +
|}

Revision as of 12:41, 12 April 2011

Polarimetry

Compton

87.41 +/- 0.12 (stat) +/- 1.77 (sys) %

Moller

88.92 +/- 0.04 (stat) +/- 1.12 (sys) %

Compton

Mindy's HAPLOG post:

http://ace.phys.virginia.edu:8080/HAPPEX/2582

Final result: 87.41 +/- 0.12 (stat) +/- 1.77 (sys) % (??)

chi^2/NDoF = 1.09 for 13 points over the experiment

Systematic Error

Rel Uncer. (%)
Laser Pol. 0.07 http://ace.phys.virginia.edu:8080/HAPPEX/2530
Gain shift 1.3 email from Megan Friend, see below
Collimator Pos. 0.02 http://ace.phys.virginia.edu:8080/HAPPEX/2568
Nonlinearity 0.3 http://ace.phys.virginia.edu:8080/HAPPEX/2569
Analyzing Power 1.53
TOTAL 2.03

Systematic Error Notes

  • From Megan over gain shift:
I don't think I'm going to be able to get a number for the gain shift
during PREX, although it should scale linearly with signal-background
size. Using the 1% gain shift we saw during HAPPEX (signal+bkg to
background = 122e6 to 53e6), that would give us a 0.8% gain shift for
PREX (signal+bkg to background = 48e6 to 30e6 at 1kHz * 3.3 to convert
to 30Hz). This would give us a change in the final polarization number
of 1.3%, if it's folded into the background subtraction ( which comes
from comparing a background subtraction of
(48e6-30e6*(1.008))/(48e6-30e6) ). So I'd say the possible gain shift
gives you a 1.3% systematic error.
  • From Megan over radiative correction:
I just ran through the PREX data to add in a radiative correction, and I
get that this increases the analyzing power by 0.3% (from 0.01828903 to
0.01834393). This is consistent with what I've seen, so I think it's
safe to add that in there.

There is an increase in analyzing power of 0.3%, which corresponds to a decrease in beam polarization by 0.3%. Therefore, the final analyzing power should multiply by (1+0.003) due to A_real = A_exp * (1+0.3%)

w/o the radiative correction:

analyzing power = 0.01824526 +- 0.00002583 (sta.) +- 0.000279099 (sys.)

w/ the radiative correction:

analyzing power = 0.018299996 +- 0.00002583 (sta.) +- 0.000279099 (sys.)


Moller

http://www.jlab.org/~moller/e02-006.html

Final result weighted average: 88.92 +/- 0.04 (stat) +/- 1.12 (sys) %

(not sure if the systematic is relative or absolute)

Systematic Error

Sasha's report at the Jan 2011 collaboration meeting http://www.jlab.org/~moller/docs/PREX_Col_01_29_2011.pdf

Uncer. (%)
Fe Pol. 0.25
Targ Discrep. 0.5
Targ Saturation 0.3
Analyzing power 0.3
Levchuk 0.5
Targ temp 0.02
Dead time 0.3
Background 0.3
Others 0.5
Current diff 0.3
TOTAL 1.12