Difference between revisions of "Target density variation check"

From PREX Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "* First measurement 09/02/2019 ** HALOG summary: [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3727894] ** Target #7 and #10 were checked for current range 5-70uA ** Septum mistuned on pur...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
* First measurement 09/02/2019
 
* First measurement 09/02/2019
** HALOG summary: [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3727894]
+
** [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3727894 HALOG summary]
 
** Target #7 and #10 were checked for current range 5-70uA
 
** Target #7 and #10 were checked for current range 5-70uA
 
** Septum mistuned on purpose in order to reduce rates, T2 trigger is used
 
** Septum mistuned on purpose in order to reduce rates, T2 trigger is used
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
* Second measurement 09/03/2019
 
* Second measurement 09/03/2019
** HALOG summary: https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3727983
+
** [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3727983 HALOG summary]
** Took high statistics run at very low current (30nA requested)
+
** Took high statistics run at very low current (30nA requested), Target #10
 
** Similar result shown in RHRS data as previous high current test
 
** Similar result shown in RHRS data as previous high current test
 
** Different distribution in LHRS is puzzling
 
** Different distribution in LHRS is puzzling

Revision as of 15:21, 3 September 2019

  • First measurement 09/02/2019
    • HALOG summary
    • Target #7 and #10 were checked for current range 5-70uA
    • Septum mistuned on purpose in order to reduce rates, T2 trigger is used
    • Sieve in
    • Clear non-uniformity observed from degraded target (#10) compared to good (still in use) target (#7).
    • More visible at higher current, but hint of similar signature of density rearrangement seen at low current.
    • Consistent results from both LHRS and RHRS spot data


  • Second measurement 09/03/2019
    • HALOG summary
    • Took high statistics run at very low current (30nA requested), Target #10
    • Similar result shown in RHRS data as previous high current test
    • Different distribution in LHRS is puzzling