Difference between revisions of "WAC Notes November 12 2020"

Revision as of 15:04, 9 November 2020

RCDB	HALOG	HAPLOG	DocDB	Online Prompt	BlueJeans Link	Runlist spreadsheet

PREX Main << Weekly Analysis Coordinator << WAC Notes CREX << WAC Post-Run_Meeting Notes

WAC Notes November 5 2020 << >> WAC Notes November 19 2020

Date and time: November 12, 2020, 11:00am
Bluejeans ID: 454783784
Meeting link: https://bluejeans.com/454783784
Runlist spreadsheet

Each WAC will suggest changes for their run period, which will be discussed at this meeting:

Slug 186 - 7626 - was not included before - is the very first run, it has 5 sigma Aq (no Aq feedback) and FFB commissioning/noise, but otherwise is fine
Slug 186 - 7627 - was included before - Has 2 sigma Aq (bad Aq feedback). Also, FFB turning on an off is a mess, but as far as I can tell, there is no negative impact on slopes or corrections (so it should be tolerated)
Slug 186 - 7628 - needs cuts - One very brief 1.5 mm 12X jump
Slug 186 - 7630 - needs cuts - Another brief 1.5 mm 12X jump
Slug 186 - 7631 - needs cuts - Another brief 1.5 mm 12X jump
Slug 186 - 7632 - Really huge FFB noise... is it worth keeping the 150um + BPM Y RMS data? X is OK.
Slug 186 - 7634 - Really huge FFB noise still
Slug 186 - 7635 - BPM 1 YP wire looks fishy, otherwise OK. Some BPM 12X noise, very brief. Same FFB noise problems as before.

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 * Slug 186 - 7630 - '''needs cuts''' - Another brief 1.5 mm 12X jump
 * Slug 186 - 7631 - '''needs cuts''' - Another brief 1.5 mm 12X jump
-* Slug 186 - 7632 - Really huge FFB noise... is it worth keeping the 150um + BPM Y RMS data? X is OK.
+* Slug 186 - 7632 - ''Really huge FFB noise... is it worth keeping the 150um + BPM Y RMS data?'' X is OK.
+* Slug 186 - 7634 - Really huge FFB noise still
+* Slug 186 - 7635 - ''BPM 1 YP wire looks fishy'', otherwise OK. Some BPM 12X noise, very brief. Same FFB noise problems as before.
 === Sakib ===